Réalisation d'un audit du montant des compensations dues à Holding ŁÓDŹ sp. z o.o. pour l'année 2025 au titre de deux contrats

This tender for an audit service is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial specifics, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and organization. The submission deadline is provided, though its reasonableness for the scope is not fully assessable without more context. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

The title and description clearly state the subject of the audit. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions. Three tender documents are available, contributing to completeness.

The tender is characterized as 'E-Procurement' and 'Divided into Parts', suggesting a fair process. Full document access is implied by the availability of documents. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the 'Issues' list indicates 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, reducing practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue create a minor inconsistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.