ASSOCIATION DE LOGEMENT TRIANGLE - CONCOURS TERRAIN, CONCEPTION ET CONSTRUCTION À LIMAVADY MARS 2026

This tender offers a good foundation with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details on evaluation criteria and e-submission, impacting overall practicality and fairness.

The tender generally adheres to regulatory requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, although the submission deadline might be considered tight depending on the complexity. No disputes are flagged. The 'Below threshold - open competition' procedure suggests compliance with relevant thresholds.

The description of the land and build requirements is reasonably clear, specifying the number of units and location. The reference to the 'housing association guide of the Department for Communities NI' provides a specific standard. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the crucial aspect of attached tender documents is weak, with 'Documents with content/summaries: 0', indicating a lack of detailed specifications and requirements available to bidders.

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a defined procedure. The requirements, as listed, are objective. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission capabilities could be seen as a disadvantage for some bidders.

The absence of e-submission is a significant drawback. While a contract start date and duration are specified, the lack of detail in attached documents and the potential shortness of the submission deadline impact practical execution for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logical, with a contract start date well after the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It also does not state if it is EU funded. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability aspects within this procurement process.