Enquête de satisfaction des touristes étrangers

This tender for a foreign tourist satisfaction study is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and an open competition format. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. No immediate regulatory non-compliance is evident.

The tender title and description are clear. Key requirements are referenced in a specific document ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'), which aids clarity, although the content of this document is not fully detailed here. The purpose of the survey is well-defined.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria within the provided tender details impacts completeness.

The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'Restricted document access', which could potentially limit fairness if not all bidders can access necessary information.

While e-procurement is mentioned, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and requires clarification. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.