GMCA965 Soutien aux services juridiques du service des déchets et des ressources de la GMCA

This tender for legal services is generally well-structured, with clear financial and temporal information. However, it relies heavily on external documentation for crucial details like evaluation criteria and submission procedures, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to the Open Procedure as per the Procurement Act 2023, indicating a standard legal framework. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context of a public tender, though the submission deadline is relatively short. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the required legal support and the specific experience needed (PPP/PFI contracts) is clear. The financial parameters and contract duration are well-defined. However, critical details regarding award criteria and submission methods are deferred to external documentation, reducing overall clarity within the provided text.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. Contract duration and start dates are specified. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents and the deferral of submission requirements to external documents significantly reduce completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for experience are objective. The reliance on external documentation for full details is a minor concern, but the core requirements are not tailored to specific companies. The absence of explicit mention of e-procurement is a slight drawback.

The contract start date is clearly defined. Financing information (budget) is provided. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of direct access to document content and the absence of explicit e-submission details hinder practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent with the contract duration and start date.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.