Hôpital Général d'Airedale - Construction d'un nouvel hôpital - Travaux de raccordement contestables de 33kV

This tender for Airedale General Hospital's 33kV connection works is generally well-structured, with a clear scope and estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender references the Procurement Act 2023 and other applicable legislation, indicating a commitment to regulatory compliance. The procedure is an open one, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate. There is no information on disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline's adequacy for the scope is not explicitly assessed here.

The description of works is detailed and specific, outlining the technical requirements for the 33kV connection. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of available document content or summaries is a significant omission, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, and submissions are exclusively via a digital platform (Atamis), promoting transparency. The estimated value is disclosed. The requirement for NERS/ENA standards is objective. The potential for the Trust to increase the fee by up to 50% is stated, which, while allowing flexibility, should be managed transparently.

Submissions are required exclusively via the Atamis Digital Platform, which is an e-submission method. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the description stating exclusive submission via Atamis. This inconsistency needs clarification. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical in sequence. The status 'planning' is consistent with a tender in progress.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.