Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Rendre le barrage de Purtiveski passable pour les poissons

Ouvert
Date limite
25 jours restants
Avril 21, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
307645
Valeur
€30,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 18, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total bid cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 18, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Avril 14, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Avril 21, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Avril 21, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Mai 11, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€30,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif des travaux est d'améliorer les conditions de migration des poissons dans la rivière Purtse.
Achats écologiquesFinancement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

15 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (5)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--All tender documents are mandatory for the bidder.
--The tender pass is a self-declaration by the entrepreneur, serving as initial proof in lieu of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--The format for expected answers in the tender pass is specified.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Prior site visit to the object is mandatory.
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Business secrets must be marked.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The project involves works for making the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish.
--Specific works include: preparation, removal of brushwood, creation of access, demolition of the opening, and reshaping of stone embankments.
--Requirements for work safety and personal protective equipment are included in the contract draft.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is an important evaluation criterion.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307645_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307645_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions, such as mandatory prior guided site visit, bid submission rules, joint bidder authorization requirements, business secret marking, and confirmation of equivalence.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307645_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus is seeking bids for the Purtsiveski dam fish passage project, where the total bid cost is a significant evaluation factor.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307645_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.3 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 56.9 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for an open tender procedure to make the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish, where all tender documents are mandatory for the bidder.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 57.2 KB

This document is a draft of the contractor agreement, outlining contract terms, technical specifications, and requirements for work safety and personal protective equipment.

Lepingu lisa 3 – Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 3- Tehniline kirjeldus Purtsiveski pais.... -- 44.9 KB

This technical specification details the works required to make the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish, including preparatory work, vegetation removal, access creation, opening demolition, and reshaping of stone walls.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidder's authorization and confirmation is a required document proving the rights and obligations of joint bidder members and confirming their compliance with tender conditions.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for fish passage improvement at Purtsi river is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. Key documents are available, and the process leverages e-procurement. However, there is limited explicit detail on innovation and social criteria beyond general mentions.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the financing source is clearly stated. No immediate disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged.

Clarté80/100

The project's objective is clearly stated, and the technical requirements are outlined in the description and technical specifications. The evaluation criteria mention relative weighting, which is standard. Conditions for contract modifications are also explained.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the contract draft and technical specifications are marked as 'No' for required, which could be improved. The financing condition is detailed.

Contract draft and technical specifications marked as not required.
Équité85/100

The tender is open, uses e-procurement, and discloses the estimated value. Objective criteria are mentioned (relative weighting). The mandatory site visit is a common practice to ensure bidders have full information. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The contract start date is specified. However, the availability of all documents via a direct URL is not explicitly confirmed, and the practicality of the XML ESPD format for all bidders is not guaranteed.

URL for all tender documents not explicitly confirmed.
Practicality of XML ESPD format for all bidders.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The status is '11', indicating an active tender. No suspensions or disputes are noted, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Durabilité50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, and the financing is from an EU fund related to improving fish spawning conditions, which has environmental benefits. However, specific details or measurable targets for innovation or social aspects are not elaborated upon.

Lack of specific details on innovation and social criteria.

Points forts

Clear project objective and technical scope
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Well-defined financing source
Reasonable estimated value and deadlines

Préoccupations

Contract draft and technical specifications marked as not required
Limited explicit detail on innovation and social criteria
Potential practicality issues with XML ESPD format

Recommandations

1. Ensure all essential documents, including contract drafts and technical specifications, are clearly marked as required.
2. Provide more specific details or measurable targets for green procurement and social criteria.
3. Clarify the accessibility and usability of the XML ESPD format for all potential bidders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline