Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Formation of fire-resistant sections at Kuninga tn 4

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
19. maaliskuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
257144
Arvo
€30,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
9. maaliskuuta 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Economically most advantageous tender100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

9. maaliskuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

12. maaliskuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

19. maaliskuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

19. maaliskuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€30,000
Kesto
3 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

The purpose of the public procurement is to conclude a procurement contract for the formation of fire-resistant sections at Kuninga tn 4 in Tallinn.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

70%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for fire compartmentation works at Kuninga tn 4 is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest net total cost while meticulously meeting all mandatory and eligibility requirements. Demonstrating proven experience through the contract list is crucial for credibility.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective Fire Safety Solutions: Delivering essential fire compartmentation works at the lowest net total cost.

Proven Expertise in Fire Protection: Demonstrating a strong history of successful similar projects through our contract portfolio.

Efficient and Compliant Delivery: Ensuring timely completion within the 3-month duration, adhering to all tender stipulations.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Price-driven evaluation allows for a strong competitive advantage if cost is optimized.
The 'or equivalent' clause provides flexibility in material and method selection, potentially allowing for cost savings.
A clear and concise bid submission can streamline the evaluation process for the contracting authority.
Keskeiset haasteet
Low estimated value (30,000 EUR) may attract highly competitive bids from smaller firms, potentially driving prices down significantly.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining the lowest bidder. Focus on efficient project management and material sourcing.

The strict 3-month duration requires efficient planning and execution to avoid penalties or contract termination.

Develop a detailed project schedule with clear milestones and resource allocation. Proactively identify potential delays and have contingency plans in place.

The absence of specific technical requirements beyond the CPV code means interpretation of 'tuletõkkesektsioonide moodustamine' is key, and a lack of detailed specifications could lead to scope creep or disputes.

Seek clarification from the contracting authority on the exact scope of works and expected standards for fire compartmentation. Ensure the bid clearly defines the scope of work to avoid ambiguity.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized construction company with a strong track record in fire protection installations and general building works. They should have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing and efficient project delivery within the 3-month timeframe. Familiarity with Estonian procurement regulations and local building standards is essential.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Electronic submission of bid
Confirmation of compliance with all tender conditions
Submission of a detailed list of previous contracts (Lisa 2)
Evidence of equivalence in Estonian if required
Registration of interest and familiarization with tender site
Compliance with general and specific contract conditions (Alusdokument, Lisa 3, Lisa 4)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure.
A well-documented track record of successfully completed fire compartmentation projects, clearly presented in Lisa 2.
A clear understanding and articulation of the proposed methodology for achieving fire resistance, even if not explicitly detailed in the tender.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While social value is not a stated requirement, consider a brief mention of commitment to local employment or waste reduction during project execution, if it can be achieved without impacting cost.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Lowest Net Total Cost100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing model. Conduct thorough cost breakdowns and identify opportunities for efficiency in labor, materials, and overheads. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accounted for to avoid underbidding and subsequent losses. Leverage the 'or equivalent' clause for potential cost savings on materials without compromising quality or compliance.

Eligibility and Mandatory Requirements

Meticulously review and ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed. Provide all required documentation (e.g., Lisa 2) accurately and completely. Confirm compliance with all tender document conditions as stated in 'Alusdokument'.

Suositukset5
Optimize Pricing for Lowest Net Total Cost
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to determine the absolute lowest viable price that ensures profitability. Factor in all direct and indirect costs, overheads, and a reasonable profit margin. Leverage the 'or equivalent' clause to source cost-effective materials that meet required standards.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thoroughly Complete Contract List (Lisa 2)
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure Lisa 2 is comprehensive, accurate, and clearly demonstrates experience relevant to fire compartmentation. Include all requested details (contractor, name, deadlines, cost, description) for each project. Highlight projects that are similar in scope or complexity.

Crucial for demonstrating eligibility and technical capability, preventing disqualification.
Seek Clarification on Scope of Works
KorkeaMatala vaiva

Proactively contact the contracting authority to clarify any ambiguities regarding the exact scope of 'tuletõkkesektsioonide moodustamine' and the expected fire resistance standards. This will prevent scope creep and ensure an accurate bid.

Reduces risk of disputes, cost overruns, and ensures bid accuracy.
Develop a Robust Project Schedule
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Create a detailed 3-month project plan with clear milestones, resource allocation, and contingency plans for potential delays. Ensure efficient site management and communication with the contracting authority.

Ensures timely completion, avoids penalties, and demonstrates reliability.
Verify All Mandatory Compliance
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Double-check that the bid confirms compliance with all tender document conditions, including those in 'Alusdokument', 'Lisa 3', and 'Lisa 4'. Ensure electronic submission is flawless.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective provider of essential fire safety works, backed by proven experience. Emphasize efficiency and adherence to timelines to build trust with the contracting authority.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

18 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (9)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with all tender document conditions.
--Evidence of equivalence must be provided in Estonian if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--All references to standards or other bases mentioned in RHS § 88 paragraph 2, § 88 paragraph 5 or § 89 paragraph 2 shall be read as supplemented by the notation "or equivalent".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must electronically submit their bid, confirming compliance with all tender document conditions.
--Bidders must provide evidence of equivalence in Estonian if required.
--Bidders must register their interest and confirm they have familiarized themselves with the tender site and obtained necessary information for preparing a price offer (Lisa 1 - Registreerimisleht.docx).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the formation of fire-resistant sections (Kuninga tn 4 tuletõkkesektsioonide moodustamine).
--The CPV code is "Installation of fire protection equipment".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 30,000.0 EUR.
--The tender will be evaluated based on the lowest net total cost, with the lowest priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

8 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
257144_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.4 KB

Bidders must submit their bid electronically, confirming compliance with all tender document conditions and providing proof of equivalence in Estonian if necessary.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
257144_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the lowest total cost excluding VAT, with the lowest priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
257144_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 37.1 KB

The Procurement Passport, or European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument.doc -- 114.0 KB

The tender document "Alusdokument" contains general terms and submission requirements for the fire compartmentation tender.

Lisa 1 - RegistreerimislehtDOC
Lisa 1 - Registreerimisleht.docx -- 17.3 KB

This registration form confirms that the company has visited the tender site and obtained the necessary information to prepare a price offer.

Lisa 2 - Lepingute nimekiriDOC
Lisa 2 - Lepingute nimekiri.docx -- 39.0 KB

The bidder must submit a list of their previous contracts, detailing the contractor, contract name, timelines, cost, and a brief description, to demonstrate their experience.

Lisa 3 - Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimusedDOC
Lisa 3 - Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimused... -- 37.2 KB

This document outlines special conditions for the construction works contract, specifying contractor and client details, the subject of the contract, and deadlines for handover and payment.

Lisa 4 - Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimusedPDF
Lisa 4 - Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimused... -- 168.3 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for a construction works contract, governing contract formation, contractor obligations and confirmations, and the basis for contract execution.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for fire-resistant sections in Tallinn is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed financing information.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement laws and regulations, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of the tender. No disputes are noted.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached documents. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on cost.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. Key documents like registration forms, contract lists, and contract conditions are attached. However, the financing condition is generic.

Reiluus85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and uses e-procurement. Criteria are objective (lowest cost). The 'or equivalent' clause promotes fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while financing is mentioned as local government budget, specific details are absent. The duration is clearly specified.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of works and requirements.
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest cost).
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for standards.

Huolenaiheet

Lack of specific details on financing beyond the source.
Absence of explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Suositukset

1. Provide more specific details regarding the financing of the project.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability or innovation criteria if applicable to the project's nature.
3. Clarify the intended contract start date.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa