Yhteistyöhön perustuva toimituskehys 2

This tender presents a comprehensive framework for asset management services with a clear structure and extensive detail, though some administrative aspects could be improved.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clear procedure and CPV code. The submission deadline appears reasonable given the complexity and value. No disputes are noted. The procedure is competitive and flexible.

The description of services, lots, and sub-lots is detailed and understandable. Requirements are documented, and the use of an e-sourcing portal for access and communication is specified. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts clarity.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and a reveal date is missing, hindering full assessment.

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the value and using an e-procurement portal. Objective criteria are implied through the lot structure, and access to documents is provided via the portal. The requirement to bid on sub-lots rather than main lots is clearly communicated.

E-submission is mandated through the Atamis portal, and a clear URL is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is substantial.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The structure of lots and sub-lots is consistent.

While the tender mentions nature-based solutions, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, limiting the score in this category.