Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Kutualueiden parannustyöt

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 15, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307607
Arvo
€60,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 19, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid price100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 19, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€60,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Työn tavoitteena on parantaa kalojen kutu- ja elinolosuhteita Kullaaru-ojassa, Laanemõisa-ojassa, Loo-joessa ja Purtsi-joessa. Työ koostuu neljästä työkohteesta: Kohde I – Kullaaru-oja (Paatnan kylä, Rakveren kunta, Lääne-Virumaa) Kohde II – Laanemõisa-oja (Kariväravan kylä, Rakveren kunta, Lääne-Virumaa) Kohde III – Loo-joki (Ilmatsalun kylä, Kuusalun kunta, Harjumaa) Kohde IV – Purtsi-joki (Elvan kunta, Tarton maakunta). Töiden toteutus perustuu suunnittelutoimisto Vesiaed OÜ:n laatimiin suunnitelmiin „Kullaaru-ojan kutualueiden parantamisen suunnittelu“ (Työ nro VA2502-1, versio 02), „Laanemõisa-ojan kutualueiden parantamisen suunnittelu“ (Työ nro VA2502-3, versio 02), „Loo-joen kutualueiden parantamisen suunnittelu“ (Työ nro VA2502-4, versio 02) ja „Purtsi-joen kutualueiden parantamisen suunnittelu“ (Työ nro VA2502-2, versio 01). Töiden toteutus perustuu suunnittelutoimisto Kobras OÜ:n laatimaan suunnitelmaan „Ojaäärse II -padon purkaminen“ (Versio 02, työ nro 2025-188).
Vihreä hankintaEU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

75%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for riverbed spawning ground improvement works is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive, cost-optimized bidding while meticulously adhering to all technical and eligibility requirements. Demonstrating a deep understanding of the ecological objectives and efficient execution will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective Ecological Restoration: Delivering maximum value for the client by providing the lowest price while ensuring high-quality, ecologically sound improvements to fish spawning grounds.

Streamlined, In-House Expertise: Guaranteeing efficient project delivery and quality control through our dedicated team, eliminating the complexities and potential cost increases associated with subcontractors.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Dominant Price Sensitivity: The 100% weighting on price presents a significant opportunity for bidders who can accurately cost and optimize their operations to offer the lowest bid.
Clear Technical Scope: The availability of detailed project designs from Vesiaed OÜ and Kobras OÜ provides a solid foundation for accurate cost estimation and planning.
Geographic Concentration: While spread across four locations, the sites are within a defined region (Lääne-Virumaa, Harjumaa, Tartu maakond), allowing for potential logistical efficiencies if planned strategically.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense Price Competition: The 100% price weighting means that even minor cost differences will significantly impact scoring, requiring extremely aggressive pricing.

Conduct thorough, detailed costings of all labor, materials, and equipment. Explore all avenues for operational efficiency and bulk purchasing. Consider a slightly lower profit margin than usual if feasible.

No Subcontractors Allowed: This limits the ability to outsource specialized tasks or scale up rapidly, requiring the bidder to have all necessary in-house capabilities.

Ensure the bidder's team possesses all the required skills and certifications for the scope of work. If any gaps exist, they must be addressed internally or through direct hires before bidding.

Unspecified Duration: The lack of a defined contract duration makes it harder to accurately forecast resource allocation and overheads, potentially leading to under or overestimation.

Estimate a realistic duration based on the scope of works and the number of sites. Factor in potential weather delays and site access issues. Clearly state assumptions made regarding duration in the bid if possible or build in contingency.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in river restoration, ecological engineering, or similar water construction projects. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing, a strong understanding of environmental regulations in Estonia, and the capacity to execute all works in-house without subcontractors.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Total bid price without VAT
Confirmation of eligibility and completion of Hankepass (ESPD)
Adherence to technical specifications outlined in project designs
No subcontractors involved
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated understanding of the ecological goals beyond just the technical execution, showing how the proposed methods will specifically benefit fish spawning.
A highly detailed and efficient project execution plan that clearly outlines how the works will be completed within a competitive timeframe and budget.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential environmental risks specific to each site, demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices.
A clear and concise presentation of the bid, making it easy for the evaluator to understand the value proposition and confirm compliance.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commitment to employing local labor where feasible for site preparation and general assistance, contributing to the local economy in Rakvere, Kuusalu, and Elva regions. This can be framed as a 'local community support' initiative.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible price without compromising essential quality or compliance. Conduct rigorous cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all efficiencies. Consider a lean profit margin. Ensure the price is presented clearly and without errors.

Suositukset7
Meticulous Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, providing all requested self-declarations and confirming eligibility. Any errors or omissions here can lead to immediate disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Aggressive Price Optimization
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% price weighting, conduct a granular cost breakdown for each site and task. Identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient logistics, optimized material sourcing, and streamlined work processes. Aim to be the absolute lowest bidder.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Demonstrate Ecological Understanding
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

While not explicitly scored, subtly weave in language that demonstrates a deep understanding of the ecological purpose of the works (improving fish spawning and living conditions). Highlight how your methods are best suited to achieve these specific environmental outcomes.

Builds confidence and perceived value beyond just price.
Confirm In-House Capability for All Tasks
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Explicitly state and be prepared to evidence that all works will be performed by your own personnel, as subcontractors are not permitted. This requires a thorough internal assessment of your team's skills and capacity.

Ensures compliance with a critical tender restriction.
Address Unspecified Duration Proactively
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Based on the project scope and number of sites, estimate a realistic project duration. If possible, include this assumption in your bid or have a clear internal plan for managing the timeline efficiently, accounting for potential delays.

Reduces risk of cost overruns or missed deadlines.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
MatalaMatala vaiva

Include a statement about prioritizing local labor for general tasks where feasible. This adds a positive social dimension without significantly impacting cost or complexity.

Enhances bid appeal and aligns with potential broader public sector objectives.
Accurate Price Offer Form Completion
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure the 'Lisa 2 – Hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx' is completed precisely as requested, with all figures accurate and without any formatting errors that could lead to misinterpretation.

Ensures the price is evaluated correctly.
Kilpailuasema
Position your bid as the most cost-effective solution that guarantees compliance and quality through direct, in-house execution. Emphasize efficiency and a clear understanding of the ecological objectives to build trust beyond just the price.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

11 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (5)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must complete the price offer form (Lisa 2 – Hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx).
--Bidders must define business secrets.
--Bidders must not involve subcontractors.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion of fraud, money laundering, and terrorism financing (as per 307607_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their status and provide initial self-declaration as per the Hankepass (307607_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf).
--For joint bids, a power of attorney is required (HD Lisa 1, vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri (3) (1).doc).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The technical description specifies the objective, locations, and underlying projects for the spawning ground improvement works (Tehniline kirjeldus_307607_Kudealade parandustööd.docx).
--Contract project defines the conditions for carrying out the works, including necessary personal protective equipment and workwear (Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt_307607_Kudealade parandustööd.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score (307607_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

12 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307607_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 41.1 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on the exclusion of fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307607_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.0 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to complete a price offer form, submit a power of attorney for joint bids, define trade secrets, and confirm non-involvement of subcontractors, as part of the tender conditions.

Lisa 1- Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 2 – Hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 20.7 KB

Appendix 1 of the tender documents is a price offer form where detailed prices for various spawning area improvement works must be submitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307607_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

Tender evaluation criteria focus on the total bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307607_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.0 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

HankedokumentDOC
HD_307607_3699_Kudealade parandustööd.docx -- 59.0 KB

The Estonian National Forest Management Centre invites bids for habitat improvement works in four locations, funded by the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
HD Lisa 1, vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri (3... -- 35.5 KB

This document is a joint tenderer's power of attorney and confirmation, required for tender submission.

Kullaaru, Laanemõisa projektid koos lisadegaZIP
Lisa 1 – Kullaaru, Laanemõisa projektid koos ... -- 84.3 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt_307607_Kudealade paran... -- 58.0 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms of execution, appendices, and required personal protective equipment and workwear for the works.

Loo ja Purtsi projektid koos lisadegaZIP
Lisa 2 – Loo ja Purtsi projektid koos lisadeg... -- 34.6 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Lisa 3 – Veekeskkonnariskiga tegevuse registreeringudZIP
Lisa 3 – Veekeskkonnariskiga tegevuse registr... -- 278.5 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus_307607_Kudealade parandus... -- 60.2 KB

This technical specification details the objectives, locations, and underlying projects for habitat improvement works, essential for tender submission.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for habitat improvement works is generally well-structured and compliant, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, some documentation formats are not machine-readable, and the sustainability aspects are limited.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The procedure type 'E' (Open Procedure) and 'A' (Award of Contract) are standard. The mention of EU funding adds a layer of regulatory oversight.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works and their objectives is clear, with specific locations provided. The underlying projects are referenced, and the technical specifications are available. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'relative_weighting' with the lowest price receiving the maximum score, which is clear.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the technical specification, contract draft, and price offer form are indicated as required. However, some attached documents are in formats not analyzed by AI (e.g., .zip), potentially hiding crucial details.

Some attached documents are in unanalyzed formats (.zip), potentially obscuring critical information.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with no apparent tailoring to specific companies. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, promoting fairness. The requirement for bidders not to involve subcontractors is a specific condition but not inherently unfair if justified.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are in place. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information (EU funded) is present. However, the reliance on unanalyzed document formats might hinder practical submission for some bidders.

Reliance on unanalyzed document formats (.zip) may present practical challenges for bidders.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, there is no detailed information on specific social aspects or innovation requirements beyond this general label. The funding source (EU Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund) implies adherence to EU standards, which often include sustainability, but this is not detailed within the tender itself.

Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation beyond the 'Green Procurement' label.

Vahvuudet

Clear technical specifications and objectives.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
EU funding indicated, suggesting adherence to higher standards.

Huolenaiheet

Some crucial documents are in unanalyzed file formats (.zip).
Limited specific details on sustainability beyond the 'Green Procurement' label.

Suositukset

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
2. Elaborate on specific green procurement, social, and innovation requirements to provide clearer guidance to bidders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Uusi palvelu

Haluatko meidän hoitavan tämän tarjouskilpailun?

Hankinta-asiantuntijamme valmistavat kaiken. Todistetusti toimii – sinä tarkistat, hyväksyt ja lähetät.

~1hSinun aikasi
80%+80 %+
$0Ennakkoon
Katso täysi vertailu
Ilman TaaS-palveluaTaaS-palvelulla
40-80 h
Valmisteluaika
~1 h
Sinun aikasi
15-25 %
Keskimääräinen voittoprosentti
80 %+
Voittoprosentti
Virheiden riski
Manuaalinen tarkastus
Asiantuntija QA
Vaatimustenmukaisuuden tarkistus
Teet kaiken
Hoidat kaiken
Me teemme kaiken
Kattava palvelu
Voitetaan tämä tarjouskilpailu
Maksa vasta kun voitat · 400+ yritystä luottaa meihin
Tai tee se itse

Lisää prosessiin