Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Järvekülan urheiluhallin stadionin maalaus

Suljettu
Määräaika
0 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 15, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
307029
Arvo
€40,323
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 11, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid cost100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 11, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 08, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 15, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€40,323
Kesto
4 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hankinnan tarkoituksena on suorittaa Järvekülan urheiluhallin stadionin tartan-pinnoitteen kunnostustyöt. HUOM! Tarjouksen jättäminen edellyttää työkohteeseen tutustumista. Tapaamisen voi sopia Peetrin aluejohtajan Marek Sooäärin kanssa (puh: 5553 2551, sähköposti: marek@raespordikeskus.ee). Työkohteeseen tutustumiseen osallistuminen on rekisteröitävä paikan päällä välillä 01.04 - 10.04.2026.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

75%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for the Järveküla sports hall stadium tartan surface renovation is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive bid while meticulously demonstrating technical capability and adherence to World Athletics standards. Proactive engagement with the site visit and thorough understanding of the technical drawings are paramount.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering a high-quality, compliant tartan surface renovation at the most competitive price.

Proven Expertise: Demonstrating a track record of successful sports facility renovations adhering to international standards.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Leverage the 100% price weighting to secure maximum evaluation points.
Gain detailed site-specific insights during the mandatory site visit to refine costings and scope.
Thoroughly analyze the stadium drawings (Staadioni joonis.pdf) to ensure precise scope definition and avoid cost overruns.
Utilize the Hankepass (ESPD) to efficiently demonstrate compliance with eligibility and technical requirements.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct a detailed cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, and streamline labor to achieve the lowest possible bid without compromising quality. Explore economies of scale if applicable.

Potential for scope creep or misinterpretation of technical specifications if drawings are not fully understood.

Dedicate significant time to analyzing 'Staadioni joonis.pdf' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. If any ambiguity exists, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority during the designated period.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements, including site visit registration and Hankepass completion, are met precisely by the deadline.

Establish a clear internal checklist and assign responsibility for each submission requirement. Schedule reminders for the site visit registration and submission deadlines.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A specialized sports surface contractor with proven experience in tartan track renovation and line marking according to international standards. The ideal bidder possesses efficient operational processes to minimize costs and a strong understanding of material procurement to offer a competitive price.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Familiarity with the site (mandatory site visit registration)
Technical capability for tartan surface renovation and line marking per World Athletics rules
Compliance with all tender conditions and submission requirements (Hankepass, contract agreement)
Understanding of the exact scope and location of painting works (Staadioni joonis.pdf)
Lowest bid cost for maximum evaluation score
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrating a deep understanding of World Athletics lining standards and the ability to execute them flawlessly.
Presenting a highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that justifies the competitive pricing.
Providing evidence of past successful tartan track renovations with minimal defects and excellent client feedback (even if not explicitly requested, it can be a strong implicit differentiator).
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly requested, consider a brief mention of using locally sourced materials where feasible, or employing local labor for specific tasks, to demonstrate a commitment to the community, even if it doesn't directly impact the score.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components: materials, labor, equipment, and overhead. Conduct thorough market research on material costs and labor rates. Ensure efficient project planning to minimize project duration and associated costs.

Suositukset7
Mandatory Site Visit Registration and Attendance
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Ensure timely registration for the site visit between 01.04 and 10.04.2026 and attend the visit to gain critical on-site knowledge. This is a prerequisite for submission.

Enables bid submission and provides crucial context for accurate pricing and scope understanding.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% price weighting, develop a highly competitive bid. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thorough Analysis of Technical Drawings
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Dedicate significant resources to understanding 'Staadioni joonis.pdf' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. Identify all painting areas, dimensions, and specific requirements to ensure a precise and cost-effective proposal.

Prevents scope misinterpretation, ensures technical compliance, and supports accurate pricing.
Accurate Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Complete the Hankepass (ESPD) accurately and comprehensively, ensuring all eligibility and qualification criteria are met. Double-check all entries before submission.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on administrative grounds.
Proactive Clarification Seeking
KorkeaMatala vaiva

If any aspect of the technical specifications or drawings is unclear, do not hesitate to seek clarification from the contracting authority within the designated period. This demonstrates diligence and avoids potential disputes later.

Reduces risk of errors, misunderstandings, and potential cost overruns.
Highlight World Athletics Compliance Expertise
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

While not explicitly a scoring criterion, subtly emphasize the company's proven ability to meet World Athletics standards for line marking. This builds confidence in technical capability.

Builds trust and reinforces technical competence, especially if competitors are less specialized.
Consider Local Sourcing/Employment Mention
MatalaMatala vaiva

If feasible and without impacting cost significantly, briefly mention any local sourcing or employment practices to align with broader public procurement expectations, even if not scored.

Minor positive perception, potentially useful in tie-breaking scenarios or for future tenders.
Kilpailuasema
Focus on demonstrating that your aggressive pricing is not at the expense of quality or compliance. Highlight your efficiency and expertise in sports surface renovation to assure the contracting authority of a reliable outcome, even with the lowest bid.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

14 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (5)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (3)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The initial proof of a company's qualification and compliance with tender conditions is to be filled out electronically (Hankepass).
--The bidder must sign the contract agreement for the painting works of Järveküla sports hall stadium.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-15 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm familiarity with the site.
--Bidders must accept the tender conditions.
--Bidders must confirm their bid complies with requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for renovation works of the Tartan surface of Järveküla sports hall stadium.
--Works include preparation, installation of a new surface, and lining the stadium according to World Athletics rules.
--Understanding the exact scope and location of painting works is required (refer to Staadioni joonis.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid will be evaluated based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
307029_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, acceptance of terms, bid compliance, and clarification of equivalency to submit a valid offer.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307029_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307029_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.6 KB

The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt Järveküla spordihoone st... -- 31.2 KB

The draft contract project outlines the terms of the works contract for painting the Järveküla sports hall stadium, which the contractor must sign.

Staadioni joonisPDF
Staadioni joonis.pdf -- 610.3 KB

The stadium drawing is necessary to understand the exact scope and location of the painting works.

Staadioni maaameti kaartDOC
Staadioni maaameti kaart.docx -- 1.9 MB

This document contains the stadium land survey map, which is necessary for participating in the tender for painting the sports hall stadium in Rae municipality.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 517.0 KB

The contracting authority seeks a bid for the renovation of the Järveküla sports hall stadium's tartan surface, including preparation, new surface installation, and line marking according to World Athletics rules.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for stadium painting is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a mandatory site visit which could be a minor barrier.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. The financing condition is clearly stated. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (VO) is standard.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are provided. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, implying a clear method. The requirement for a site visit is also clearly communicated.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the technical description and draft contract are attached. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is in an XML format not directly analyzable, and the 'Staadioni joonis' and 'Staadioni maaameti kaart' are marked as not required, which could be a point of confusion.

ESPD document format not directly analyzable.
Non-required but potentially important documents (Staadioni joonis, Staadioni maaameti kaart) are not mandatory.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on the lowest price, which is objective. Full document access is implied. The mandatory site visit, while practical for understanding the scope, could be seen as a minor hurdle for some potential bidders if not managed efficiently.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract duration and start period are specified. Financing conditions are clear. However, the mandatory site visit registration period (01.04 - 10.04.2026) is quite specific and might limit flexibility for some bidders.

Specific and potentially restrictive window for mandatory site visit registration.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This is a missed opportunity to incorporate broader societal benefits.

Lack of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Vahvuudet

Clear technical requirements and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Standard e-procurement process.
Well-defined timeline and financial terms.

Huolenaiheet

No explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
Mandatory site visit with a specific registration window.
ESPD document in an unanalyzable format.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly materials, waste reduction) in future tenders.
2. Consider offering more flexibility for site visits or providing detailed virtual tours.
3. Ensure all essential documents are in a universally analyzable format.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin