Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Preparation of the main project for Märjamaa waste station

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
7. huhtikuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
306980
Arvo
€45,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
26. maaliskuuta 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total bid price100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

26. maaliskuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

31. maaliskuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

7. huhtikuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

6. huhtikuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€45,000
Kesto
6 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€71,415
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.8
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
2,006 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

The aim of the procurement is to find a designer for the construction of a waste station in Märjamaa municipality, Orgita village, on the land owned by the Waste Centre (KÜ 50301:001:0170).
EU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender is a price-driven opportunity focused on the preparation of a main project for a waste station. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid price, supported by demonstrable experience in similar projects and qualified personnel. While social value and innovation are not explicit criteria, demonstrating efficiency and a clear understanding of the technical requirements will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for Märjamaa's waste station project.

Proven expertise in delivering essential infrastructure projects on time and within budget.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Sole reliance on price for evaluation offers a clear path to winning for a low-cost provider.
The defined scope (studies, approvals, permits, supervision) allows for precise cost estimation and resource allocation.
The relatively low estimated value suggests a project manageable by smaller, agile firms who can offer competitive pricing.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to the 100% price evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore efficient project delivery methodologies and leverage existing templates or software for faster design processes. Consider partnerships for specific tasks if it reduces overall cost.

Demonstrating sufficient prior experience in 'main projects' if the bidder's portfolio is diverse.

Clearly highlight and quantify relevant past projects that align with the scope of a waste station's main project. Emphasize the complexity and scale of these projects, even if they were not explicitly for waste management facilities, as long as they involved similar design and approval processes.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with a proven track record in designing waste management facilities or similar industrial infrastructure projects. They must possess a lean operational structure allowing for a highly competitive pricing strategy, coupled with a team of experienced engineers and architects capable of delivering the full scope of services efficiently.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Previous experience in preparing main projects.
Appropriately qualified key personnel.
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Total bid price (100% evaluation criterion).
Studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision.
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A highly optimized and lean project delivery methodology that translates directly into a lower bid price.
A clear demonstration of efficiency and speed in obtaining necessary permits and approvals based on past experience.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment during the author's supervision phase or the use of local suppliers for any minor on-site support, if feasible and cost-neutral.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Leverage any economies of scale or pre-existing design elements.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price the Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weight on price, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid that is still profitable and meets all requirements. Conduct a detailed cost analysis to identify all areas for optimization.

Directly determines the winning score.
Prove Relevant Project Experience
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of previous experience in preparing 'main projects', especially those involving industrial facilities, infrastructure, or complex permitting processes. Quantify the scope and complexity of these past projects.

Meets eligibility criteria and builds confidence in capability.
Highlight Qualified Key Personnel
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Present CVs and qualifications of key personnel that demonstrate their expertise in architectural design, engineering, and navigating approval processes for similar projects. Emphasize their experience relevant to waste management infrastructure if possible.

Meets eligibility criteria and demonstrates technical competence.
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
KorkeaMatala vaiva

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously reviewed and confirmed as absent. Provide clear and unambiguous confirmations as required by the tender documents.

Prevents disqualification.
Clarify Trade Secret Explanations
KorkeaMatala vaiva

Prepare clear and concise explanations regarding any trade secrets, ensuring they do not hinder the evaluation of the bid or reveal proprietary information unnecessarily.

Meets submission requirements and avoids potential issues.
Optimize Submission Format and Cost Structure
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Adhere strictly to the specified submission format and cost structure. Any deviation could lead to disqualification or a less favorable evaluation.

Ensures compliance and proper evaluation.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most efficient and cost-effective solution by highlighting streamlined processes and experienced personnel capable of delivering the project with minimal overhead. Emphasize a 'no-frills' approach that directly benefits the contracting authority through significant cost savings.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

9 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (4)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide explanations regarding trade secrets.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the terms.
--Bidders must agree to the submission format and cost structure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have previous experience in preparing main projects.
--Bidders must have appropriately qualified key personnel.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The project includes studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision during construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

5 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
306980_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

The bidder must provide explanations regarding trade secrets, confirm acceptance of terms, agree to the submission format and cost structure, and provide proof of equivalence if necessary.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306980_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306980_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, demonstrate prior experience in preparing main project designs, and possess qualified key personnel.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (Jäätmejaama põhip... -- 41.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks a designer to prepare the main project for the Märjamaa waste station, including studies, approvals, permit applications, and author supervision during construction.

hankelepingu olulised tingimusedDOC
Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projekt (Jäätmejaama põ... -- 35.3 KB

The essential terms of the procurement contract outline the object of the contract for the preparation of the main project and author's supervision for the Märjamaa waste station, the obligations of the parties, and the integral parts of the contract.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for the design of a waste station in Märjamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the objective is clear, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capabilities are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the status '11' is unclear without context, and the availability of all 5 documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as fully accessible or attached in a way that guarantees immediate download for all potential bidders.

•Status code '11' requires clarification.
Reiluus85/100

The tender is fair, with the value disclosed and objective criteria (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The requirements for previous experience and qualified personnel are standard and not overly tailored to specific companies.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided, which can impact planning for bidders.

•Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
•Contract start date is not provided.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Vahvuudet

Clear objective and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information.
Ambiguity of status code '11'.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., waste management practices, use of sustainable materials) into the technical requirements or evaluation.
2. Provide the expected contract start date and more detailed information on financing sources.
3. Clarify the meaning of the status code '11' for better transparency.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa