Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Multidisciplinær rådgivning om elevatormodernisering

Åben
Frist
6 dage tilbage
April 10, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
020782-2026
Værdi
£60,000
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 09, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 03, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 10, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 17, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£60,000
Varighed
19 måneder
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Multidisciplinær rådgivning om elevatormodernisering - for de to parkeringshuse med flere etager i Camberley.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall quality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a reasonable range for a below-threshold open competition. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the service is clear and concise. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of e-submission is a minor detractor from optimal fairness.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly defined. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the absence of e-submission reduces practicality. The availability of documents via URL is not confirmed, which could impact ease of access.

No e-submission
Financing information not detailed
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any apparent contradictions.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Deadline may be too short
Lack of sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Specify evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Provide full content for all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline