Shinfield Road Puffin Kryds

This tender for a puffin crossing construction is moderately complete and practical, with good clarity and fairness. Key areas for improvement include providing evaluation criteria and ensuring accessible document content.

The tender adheres to basic regulatory requirements with a clear CPV code and an open competition procedure for a below-threshold contract. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are recorded.

The description of the work is clear, specifying the location and the exclusion of above-ground traffic signal equipment. However, the absence of detailed technical capability requirements and evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

Basic information like title, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of accessible document content for the four attached documents is a significant gap.

The tender is an open competition, making it accessible to a broad range of bidders. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are generally objective, not appearing tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active and specifies contract start and duration. However, the lack of an explicit e-submission process and the unavailability of document content hinder practical participation for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, organization, value, CPV code, and dates are consistently populated. No suspension or disputes are noted, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.