Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Forudgående markedsengagementmeddelelse for Rammeaftale om Modulbygninger

Åben
Frist
15 dage tilbage
Maj 01, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Andet
Reference
023938-2026
Værdi
£1,200,000,000
Lokation
North East England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
April 08, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 17, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 24, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Maj 01, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

September 27, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£1,200,000,000
Varighed
48 måneder
Lokation
North East England
Type
Andet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Etableret i 2004, er Procurement for Housing (PfH) et nationalt indkøbskonsortium dedikeret til socialt boligbyggeri og støttet af National Housing Federation (NHF), Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) og HouseMark. Kollektivt administrerer vores medlemmer mere end 90 % af Storbritanniens sociale boligbeholdning, hvor PfH hjælper dem med at opnå effektivitetsbesparelser ved hjælp af en bred vifte af tjenester, herunder rammeaftaler, dynamiske indkøbssystemer, udgiftsanalyser, strategigennemgange, konsolideret fakturering og omfattende rapportering.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. I øjeblikket understøttet: Estland, Letland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrig, Storbritannien, Danmark, Holland, Norge og Finland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements provided in the tender document]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

OCDS RecordDOC
023938-2026_ocds_record.json

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
023938-2026_ocds_release.json

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
023938-2026_official.pdf

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This is a pre-market engagement notice for a modular buildings framework. While it provides essential information and a clear objective, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the deadline may be tight.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The notice correctly identifies the organization as a contracting authority and mentions relevant legislation. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose challenges for legal compliance in the subsequent stages of procurement.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Klarhed80/100

The description of the organization and its purpose is clear. The intention to establish a framework for modular buildings and associated services is well-articulated. However, the lack of specific details regarding submission and technical requirements reduces overall clarity.

No specific submission requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Fuldstændighed70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, crucial details like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing, impacting completeness.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is structured as a framework agreement, which generally promotes competition. The value is disclosed, and the organization is a public body. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of details on submission requirements could potentially lead to less transparent processes if not addressed in subsequent documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The notice provides a contract start date and duration. However, it does not specify an e-submission method, and the URL for additional information is provided, but no direct document URLs are listed. The absence of financing information is also noted.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a planning notice.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The notice does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the assessment of sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and its role well-defined
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Appropriate CPV code provided

Bekymringer

Missing critical requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential deadline tightness
Lack of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation elements.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Tilføj til pipeline