Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Dartmouth Park & Ride

Lukket

Fristen for indsendelse er overskredet

Fristen for indsendelse af dette udbud er overskredet, og der modtages ikke længere ansøgninger. Oplysningerne nedenfor er gemt til referenceformål.

Gennemse aktive udbud
Frist
Udløbet
Marts 09, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
012014-2026
Værdi
£600,000
Lokation
Devon, Storbritannien
Udgivet
April 12, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 10, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 02, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Marts 09, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Marts 25, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£600,000
Varighed
37 måneder
Lokation
Devon
Type
Open Procedure
67
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

A 3 + 1 year contract for the provision of a park and ride service in Dartmouth. The full details of this can be found within Volume 3 of the Invitation To Tender documents, this will include the specification, scoring criteria, etc.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. I øjeblikket understøttet: Estland, Letland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrig, Storbritannien, Danmark, Holland, Norge og Finland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

11 krav på tværs af 3 kategorier

Indsendelse (5)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit the bid electronically via the ProActis portal.
--Submit the bid by the deadline: March 9, 2026, 12:00:00 UTC.
--Provide a quality proposal that addresses the scoring criteria, as quality accounts for 30% of the evaluation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Demonstrate capability to provide public road transport services (CPV 60112000).
--Demonstrate capability to provide a park and ride service in Dartmouth.
--Be able to deliver a contract for a duration of 3+1 years (37 months).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Be able to deliver a service with an estimated contract value of approximately £500,000 (ex VAT) / 600,000 EUR.
--Submit a competitive price proposal, as price accounts for 70% of the evaluation criteria.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

OCDS RecordDOC
012014-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about a tender from South Hams District Council for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, including buyer details and the tender's planning status.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
012014-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data about the tender for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, published by South Hams District Council.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
012014-2026_official.pdf

South Hams District Council is seeking bids for a 3+1 year park and ride service in Dartmouth, with an estimated value of £500,000, requiring electronic submission via the ProActis portal by March 9, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

67
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender presents a generally clear and fair procurement process with good legal compliance, but suffers from significant data inconsistencies regarding contract duration and practical hurdles due to missing document access information. Sustainability aspects are entirely absent.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly, and the submission period of 27 days is reasonable for an open procedure. However, the absence of a clear reveal date is a minor administrative oversight.

Missing tender reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the service and the high-level evaluation criteria (70% price, 30% quality) are clear. Detailed requirements and scoring criteria are appropriately referred to Volume 3 of the ITT documents, which is standard practice.

Fuldstændighed65/100

Basic information, estimated value, and key dates are provided. However, the full specification and detailed criteria are externalized to Volume 3, and the provided data does not offer direct access to its content, limiting the completeness of the immediate tender information.

Full specification and detailed criteria not directly accessible in provided data
Inconsistency in contract duration description
Retfærdighed80/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports electronic submission, promoting equal access. The evaluation criteria split is transparent, and requirements appear generic. Fairness largely depends on the accessibility of Volume 3 to all bidders.

Praktisk anvendelighed60/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date is known. However, the absence of a direct URL or clear instructions for accessing the full tender documents (Volume 3) poses a significant practical barrier for potential bidders.

No direct URL or clear instructions for accessing full tender documents (Volume 3)
Datakonsistens50/100

A major inconsistency exists between the stated '3 + 1 year contract' and the '37 months' contract duration, as 3+1 years typically equates to 48 months. This ambiguity requires clarification. Some minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also unpopulated.

Inconsistency between '3 + 1 year contract' and '37 months' duration
Missing 'Liable Person' and procedure codes
Bæredygtighed20/100

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete lack of integration of sustainability considerations.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects considered

Styrker

Clear procedure type and CPV code
Electronic submission supported via ProActis portal
Transparent evaluation criteria split (70% price, 30% quality)
Estimated value and key dates (submission, start) are specified
No disputes or suspensions reported

Bekymringer

Significant inconsistency in contract duration (3+1 years vs. 37 months)
Lack of direct URL or clear access instructions for full tender documents (Volume 3)
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing tender reveal date
Reliance on external documents for detailed requirements and criteria

Anbefalinger

1. Clarify the exact contract duration to resolve the '3+1 year' vs. '37 months' inconsistency.
2. Provide a direct URL or explicit instructions for accessing all tender documents, especially Volume 3.
3. Integrate sustainability, social, or innovation criteria into future procurement processes to align with modern best practices.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Tilføj til pipeline