Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Opfordring til at afgive tilbud på udskiftning af vinduer og døre på Kessingland og Moorlands Primary Academies

Åben
Frist
19 dage tilbage
April 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026990-2026
Værdi
£48,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 24, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 19, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£48,000
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Diocese of Norwich Education Services Company (DoNESC) gennemfører en indkøbsproces på vegne af DNEAT for Kessingland og Moorlands Primary Academies for at udskifte døre og vinduer som angivet i den yderligere dokumentation. Moorlands vinduer og døre skal være i brun farve, og Moorlands skal være i hvid farve.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

7 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Replacement of doors and windows as highlighted in the additional documentation.
--Moorlands windows and doors to be finished in Brown.
--Kessingland windows and doors to be finished in white.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization details, and a CPV code. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the absence of a reveal date, which is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the work is clear, specifying the type of service and the locations. The technical requirements, such as color specifications for different academies, are also clearly stated. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which hinders a complete understanding of how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the critical absence of content for the tender documents means that essential details for bidders are not accessible. This significantly impacts the completeness of the tender package.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The criteria are objective in terms of the technical requirements (color specifications). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of e-submission is a minor drawback in terms of modern procurement practices.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of accessible document content make the practical execution of the tender process challenging for potential bidders. Information on financing is not provided.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. The CPV code is appropriate for the service.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation initiatives. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Value and contract duration specified
Appropriate CPV code provided
Objective technical requirements (color specifications)

Bekymringer

No content available for tender documents
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission mechanism
Lack of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full content for all tender documents.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission process for future tenders.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline