Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

003264 – Gennemgang af overvågningstjeneste for enligs-rabat (SPD)

Åben
Frist
9 dage tilbage
April 13, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
023496-2026
Værdi
£124,800
Lokation
Tees Valley and Durham, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 16, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 06, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 13, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£124,800
Varighed
24 måneder
Lokation
Tees Valley and Durham
Type
Open Procedure
69
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Tidligere blev der udfyldt en simpel formular, hvor kunden underskrev for at bekræfte, at de var den eneste voksne beboer, der var ansvarlig for ejendomsskatten, før SPD blev tildelt. Selvom denne mulighed stadig er tilgængelig for kunderne, kan de fra 2017 også udfylde en intelligent online åben kanal formular, der overføres til Durham County Council's (DCC) ejendomsskatte-system og automatisk opdaterer den forpligtelse, der tildeler rabatten. Dette har fjernet behovet for manuel indgriben fra DCC's tildelingsmedarbejdere.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements listed in the provided text.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds listed in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements listed in the provided text.]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements listed in the provided text.]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements listed in the provided text.]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
69
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for SPD Monitoring Service Review is generally well-structured but lacks detailed technical and eligibility requirements, and specific sustainability considerations. The process appears fair with an open competition for a below-threshold contract.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning70/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear CPV code and open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, but the short submission window might be a concern for some bidders. No major legal disputes are indicated.

Potentially short submission deadline for a service review.
Klarhed75/100

The description of the service is clear in its context, explaining the evolution of the SPD process. However, the AI-extracted requirements highlight a lack of specific detailed criteria for evaluation, technical capability, and eligibility, which could be improved.

Lack of specific evaluation criteria.
Absence of detailed technical capability requirements.
Fuldstændighed65/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are present. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of detailed requirements impact overall completeness.

No document content available for review.
Missing detailed requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission.
Retfærdighed80/100

The tender is an open competition for a below-threshold contract, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for evaluation, while not explicitly listed, are implied to be objective given the nature of the service. The issue is the lack of explicit documentation of these criteria.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria documentation.
Praktisk anvendelighed60/100

While the tender is active with a specified contract start date and duration, the 'Issues' section indicates 'No e-submission', which significantly impacts practicality in modern procurement. The document URL is not explicitly provided in the excerpt.

No e-submission indicated.
Document URLs not explicitly provided in the excerpt.
Datakonsistens85/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and timeline are populated. The status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Bæredygtighed40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders aiming for sustainability. This aspect is significantly underdeveloped.

No indication of green procurement criteria.
No mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear basic information provided (title, reference, organization, value, dates).
Open competition procedure for a below-threshold contract.
CPV code accurately classified.
Active status with no reported disputes.

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed technical, eligibility, and submission requirements.
No explicit evaluation criteria documented.
No e-submission capability indicated.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed technical, eligibility, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly document the evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline