Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Litteraturgennemgang: Allergenicitet af cellekultiverede produkter

Åben
Frist
16 dage tilbage
April 20, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
023354-2026
Værdi
£48,000
Lokation
North Yorkshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 16, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 13, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 20, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£48,000
Varighed
8 måneder
Lokation
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Cellekultiverede produkter (CCP'er) og alternative proteiner produceret ved biomasse eller præcisionsfermentering er en fremvoksende fødevaresektor over hele verden. FSA CCP Sandbox-programmet er et toårigt program designet til at informere om reguleringsmæssige handlinger, der skaber den rette balance mellem at støtte innovation og sikre forbrugernes sikkerhed. CCP'er hævder at have fordele med hensyn til proteinkvalitet, miljøpåvirkning og forbedrede dyrevelfærdsaspekter. FSA søger en leverandør til at levere en litteraturgennemgang med fokus på allergenericitet af CCP'er under en 6-måneders kontrakt. Arbejdet vil undersøge videnshullet i de allergene risici ved CCP'er. Et vejledende budget på op til £40.000 (ekskl. moms) er blevet afsat til dette projekt inden for regnskabsåret 2026/2027. Tilbudsgivere bør sikre, at forslagene forbliver inden for denne budgetramme og demonstrerer værdi for pengene.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

12 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiel (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-20T00:00:00.
--The contract duration is 6 months.
--The project falls within the 2026/2027 financial year.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Tenderers must be capable of delivering an allergenicity-focused literature review of Cell Cultivated Products (CCPs).
--Proposals must demonstrate an understanding of the knowledge gap in the allergenic risks of CCPs.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Ability to conduct a comprehensive literature review on the allergenicity of CCPs.
--Expertise in identifying and analyzing knowledge gaps related to food safety and allergens.
--Understanding of the emergent food sector of CCPs and alternative proteins.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Indicative budget of up to £40,000 (excluding VAT) for the project.
--Proposals must remain within this budget envelope.
--Proposals must demonstrate value for money.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a literature review on the allergenicity of cell cultivated products is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall quality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the contract start date. No disputes are reported.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required literature review is clear, outlining the scope and the emergent nature of cell cultivated products. The AI-extracted requirements further detail the necessary capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for tenderers.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description is detailed. However, the lack of content for the tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

Documents with content/summaries: 0
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The process appears to be e-procurement, though not explicitly stated.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date is specified, and the duration is reasonable. The indicative budget is provided. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs for tender documents reduce practicality.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The contract start date is after the submission deadline. No disputes or suspensions are noted, contributing to high data consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Detailed description of the research topic
Disclosed estimated value and budget
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Potential for a tight submission deadline
Lack of explicit e-submission details

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for tenderers.
2. Provide full content or summaries for all tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline