Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

WCC Forældrerådgivning

Åben
Frist
2 dage tilbage
April 06, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
019458-2026
Værdi
£540,000
Lokation
West Midlands, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 04, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 06, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£540,000
Varighed
36 måneder
Lokation
West Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Forældre og omsorgspersoner, der er involveret i lovbestemte processer for børnebeskyttelse, oplever ofte nød, forvirring og mangel på meningsfuld involvering, hvilket kan føre til frakobling og dårligere resultater for familier og børn/unge (CYP). Som en del af Warwickshire County Council's (WCC) deltagelse i bølge 2 af det nationale "Families First for Children Pathfinder Programme" (FFCP) er der et krav om at levere en dedikeret forældrerådgivnings- og advokattjeneste for at sikre, at familier er informerede, støttede og bemyndigede gennem hele børnebeskyttelsesprocessen. Denne tjeneste sigter mod at reducere traumer, stigmatisering og isolation, samtidig med at der opbygges tillid og forbedres engagement. Derfor resulterer det i bedre resultater for familier og børn/unge. Data fra november 2024 til november 2025 fremhæver omfanget af behovet for denne tjeneste, med 715 sektion 47 (af Children's Act 1989) forespørgsler (S47) og 297 indledende børnebeskyttelseskonferencer (ICPC) afholdt. Disse involverede et samlet antal på 1807 børn.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for parental advocacy services is generally well-structured, with a clear description of need and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the service need is clear and well-articulated, providing context and data to support the requirement. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves some ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The description is detailed. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, along with no document content available, significantly reduces completeness.

No specific eligibility requirements detailed
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is clear. However, the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could be a concern for bidders, and the absence of detailed requirements makes it difficult to assess if the process is fully objective.

Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

While the contract start date and duration are specified, the lack of information on e-submission, document URLs, and financing details limits practicality. The absence of detailed submission requirements also makes it harder for bidders to prepare their proposals efficiently.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any immediate contradictions.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of service need and context
Reasonable estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure
CPV code provided

Bekymringer

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
No document content available for review
No explicit mention of sustainability aspects

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission format.
3. Upload full tender documentation with content.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline