Børne Sundhedsinformations Tjenester – Nordøst England, Yorkshire og Cumbria

This tender for Child Health Information Services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to an open procedure and references the Procurement Act 2023, indicating a commitment to current legal frameworks. The CPV code is provided, and the estimated value is clear. The mention of the Procurement Act 2023 and exclusion of PSR 2023/PCR 2015 suggests a specific legal context. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity of the tender. No disputes are noted.

The description of the Child Health Information Services (CHIS) and its primary aim is clear. The role of NECS as a procurement delivery partner is well-defined. The requirements for managing child health records and supporting public health interventions are understandable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how tenders will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the crucial tender documentation is not available for review, and the AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific exclusion grounds and detailed technical/eligibility criteria are to be found within these missing documents, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is conducted via an open procedure, which is generally fair. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of an e-tendering portal (Atamis) promotes accessibility. The opportunity is offered as a single lot, which is stated as not suitable for lotting, implying a rationale. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The use of the Atamis e-tendering portal for all communications and submissions is a positive step towards e-submission. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the lack of available tender documentation means potential bidders cannot fully assess the practicality of meeting the requirements. The absence of explicit financing information beyond the estimated value could also be a minor concern.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical in sequence. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is consistent with the service description.

The tender notice does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within the current tender information.