Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

SWAST-5032-E DSEAR-vurderinger

Åben
Frist
11 dage tilbage
April 16, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
027853-2026
Værdi
£100,000
Lokation
North East England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 09, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 16, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£100,000
Varighed
36 måneder
Lokation
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

SWAST-5032-E DSEAR-vurderinger for forskellige bygninger

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for DSEAR assessments is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its practicality and clarity.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some standards.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the service is concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible document content with summaries significantly hinder clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of explicit financing information reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and capability are mentioned, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific evaluation criteria, however, could be a minor concern.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date. However, the lack of e-submission and the unavailability of document content with summaries reduce its practicality for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code and NUTS code included
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No accessible document content or summaries
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of e-submission functionality
Limited focus on sustainability

Anbefalinger

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents fully accessible with content summaries.
3. Consider implementing e-submission for improved practicality.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline