Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Carisbrooke Primary Fase 3 Tag, Teknikrum og Brandsikre Døre

Åben
Frist
19 dage tilbage
April 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
012472-2026
Værdi
£360,000
Lokation
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 11, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 26, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£360,000
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
64
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

For at fuldføre tagopgraderingen ved at udskifte de resterende sektioner, færdiggøre arbejdet i teknikrummet efter kedeludskiftning og udskiftning af brandsikre døre.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

7 krav på tværs af 2 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Teknisk (6)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-04-24T00:00:00.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Ability to perform construction work as per CPV Category 45000000.
--Capability to complete roof upgrades by replacing the remaining sections.
--Capability to complete plant room works following boiler replacement.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Planning NoticeHTM
012472-2026.html

This tender is for construction work at Carisbrooke Primary, involving roof upgrades, completion of plant room works following boiler replacement, and renewal of fire doors for the Isle of Wight Council.

Vis
OCDS RecordDOC
012472-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about a planned tender by the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, plant room works, and fire door renewals, including a link to the official planned procurement notice on Find a Tender.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
012472-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides machine-readable information about a planned procurement notice from the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, boiler room works, and fire door renewals.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
012472-2026_official.pdf

This is a planned procurement notice from Isle of Wight Council for a construction project to upgrade roofs, plant rooms, and fire doors, with an estimated value of £300,000 and a tender submission deadline of April 24, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

64
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender exhibits good foundational information and transparency regarding value and timelines, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and lack of electronic submission, impacting clarity and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined and appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, which is a minor transparency gap, and some codes (Type, Procedure) are not populated. The submission deadline is reasonable from today's date.

Missing reveal date
Missing Type/Procedure codes
Klarhed60/100

The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed65/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and key deadlines are provided. The tender documents are also listed. The primary deficiency is the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental component of a complete tender package.

Missing evaluation criteria
"Liable Person" field empty
Retfærdighed60/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. The submission deadline provides reasonable time for preparation. However, the absence of evaluation criteria creates a significant transparency issue, potentially undermining fair competition. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Document access is implied through OCDS data. The main practical drawback is the explicit lack of electronic submission, which can increase administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No e-submission
Datakonsistens80/100

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with no reported disputes or suspensions, and logical dates. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include a slight difference in the submission deadline timestamp between the timeline and AI-extracted requirements, and some empty code fields.

Minor date timestamp inconsistency
Empty "Liable Person" and Type/Procedure codes
Bæredygtighed20/100

The tender documentation does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear project description and technical requirements
Transparent disclosure of estimated value and key timelines
Use of OCDS data for machine-readable information
Reasonable submission deadline from today's date

Bekymringer

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission option
No explicit mention of sustainability (green, social, innovation) aspects
Missing reveal date and some unpopulated fields

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair competition.
2. Implement electronic submission to enhance accessibility, efficiency, and reduce administrative burden.
3. Integrate sustainability considerations by exploring opportunities for green, social, or innovation clauses.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline