Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Internationale ekspertkonsulentydelser

Åben
Frist
18 dage tilbage
April 22, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
6996042
Værdi
€110,041
Lokation
Lithuania, Litauen
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 18, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 15, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 22, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 22, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€110,041
Varighed
24 måneder
Lokation
Lithuania
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€694,267
Gns. Tilbud
2.6
Konkurrence
Lav
SMV Vindere
89%
942 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Udbuddet omfatter konsulentydelser fra en international ekspert eller et internationalt ekspertteam, baseret på erfaring opnået i udlandet (uden for Republikken Litauen), i forbindelse med implementeringen af projektet "Udvikling og test af betalingsmodellen for sundhedsinstitutioner for opnåede resultater".
EU-finansieret

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

65%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender seeks international expert consultation on developing and piloting a results-based payment model for healthcare institutions. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating deep expertise in healthcare financing, payment reform, and international best practices, coupled with a clear understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare context. Leveraging the lack of specified evaluation criteria to proactively define value and impact will be crucial.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Proven International Expertise in Healthcare Payment Reform: We bring unparalleled global experience in designing and implementing innovative, results-based payment models that drive efficiency and improve patient outcomes.

Tailored Solutions for the Lithuanian Context: Our approach is grounded in a deep understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system, ensuring practical and sustainable solutions that address local challenges.

Commitment to Measurable Impact: We are dedicated to delivering tangible results, creating a robust framework for performance-based remuneration that aligns with the goals of the Valstybinė ligonių kasa.

Nøglemuligheder
Proactive definition of evaluation criteria and value proposition.
Leveraging the 'international expert' requirement to showcase unique global insights.
Focusing on the 'creation and testing' aspect of the payment model.
Nøgleudfordringer
Lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Develop a proposal that clearly articulates how the bidder's solution will meet and exceed the likely objectives of the contracting authority. Proactively define and present a framework for measuring success and impact, demonstrating a clear understanding of what 'results' mean in this context. This can be presented as part of the technical solution.

Potential for strong competition from established international consultancies.

Differentiate by highlighting specific, relevant case studies and demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system, rather than just generic international experience. Emphasize the synergy between global best practices and local applicability.

Ambiguity regarding specific technical and financial requirements.

In the absence of detailed requirements, assume standard best practices and provide a comprehensive, well-structured proposal that covers all logical aspects of such a project. Use the 'Proposal Form' (5_Pasiūlymo forma.docx) and 'ESPD-request' (2_EBVPD) as guides for the expected structure and content.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A consultancy firm or consortium with a proven track record in international healthcare policy reform, specifically in designing and implementing results-based financing (RBF) mechanisms for public health systems. The ideal bidder will possess a team of highly qualified international experts with direct experience in similar projects in EU or OECD countries, and a strong understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare landscape, its challenges, and its stakeholders.
Nøglekrav
Demonstrated experience in developing and piloting results-based payment models for healthcare institutions.
International expertise and experience gained outside the Republic of Lithuania.
Understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system and its specific context.
Ability to provide a team of qualified international experts.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements (though not specified, assumed to be standard).
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated success in implementing similar RBF models in comparable healthcare systems, with quantifiable improvements in efficiency and quality.
A deep understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare financing and operational landscape, including specific challenges and opportunities.
A highly experienced and cohesive international expert team with proven collaborative capabilities and a strong track record in knowledge transfer.
A robust, data-driven methodology for both the creation and testing phases of the payment model, with clear indicators for success.
Muligheder for social værdi
Commitment to knowledge transfer and capacity building for Lithuanian healthcare professionals and policymakers throughout the project lifecycle, ensuring sustainability of the developed model beyond the contract duration. This can be framed as enhancing the 'social impact' of the project by empowering local stakeholders.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Technical Solution & Methodology

Given the lack of specified criteria, this will be the primary area to demonstrate value. Focus on a clear, phased approach for developing and testing the RBF model. Detail the analytical tools, data requirements, stakeholder engagement strategy, and risk management plan. Emphasize innovation in the model design and a rigorous testing methodology.

Expert Team & International Experience

Showcase the depth and breadth of international experience of the proposed team, specifically highlighting experience in results-based financing, healthcare economics, and public health system reform. Provide detailed CVs and highlight relevant past project successes. Ensure the team composition directly addresses the project's objectives.

Understanding of Lithuanian Context

Integrate insights into the Lithuanian healthcare system throughout the proposal. This can include acknowledging current payment mechanisms, identifying key challenges, and demonstrating how the proposed model will address these specific issues. This shows a tailored, rather than generic, approach.

Price

While not explicitly weighted, a competitive price is always important. Ensure the price reflects the value and expertise offered. Avoid being the cheapest if it compromises the quality of the proposed solution or team. Justify the proposed costs based on the scope of work and the caliber of expertise.

Anbefalinger6
Develop a Proactive Evaluation Framework
KritiskHøj indsats

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, create a robust framework within the proposal that outlines how the success of the project will be measured. This framework should align with the likely objectives of the Valstybinė ligonių kasa and demonstrate how the proposed solution will deliver tangible, measurable results.

Establishes a clear value proposition and demonstrates foresight, guiding the evaluation process.
Showcase Deep International Expertise with Local Relevance
KritiskHøj indsats

Emphasize the 'international experience' requirement by providing specific examples of successful RBF model implementations in comparable healthcare systems. Crucially, demonstrate how this global knowledge will be adapted and applied to the unique context of the Lithuanian healthcare system.

Directly addresses a core tender requirement and differentiates from generic international consultancies.
Highlight Team's Collaborative and Knowledge Transfer Capabilities
HøjMedium indsats

Beyond individual expertise, emphasize the team's ability to collaborate effectively and, importantly, to transfer knowledge to Lithuanian stakeholders. This ensures the sustainability and local ownership of the developed payment model.

Adds significant value beyond the immediate project deliverables and builds trust.
Thoroughly Analyze Provided Forms
HøjMedium indsats

Scrutinize the 'Proposal Form' (5_Pasiūlymo forma.docx) and 'ESPD-request' (2_EBVPD) for implied requirements and expected submission structure. Ensure all sections are completed accurately and comprehensively, even if specific requirements are missing elsewhere.

Ensures compliance with submission procedures and provides a structured basis for the bid.
Integrate Capacity Building into the Solution
MediumMedium indsats

Propose specific activities for training and capacity building for Lithuanian healthcare professionals and administrators. Frame this as a key component of the project's success and long-term impact, even though 'Social Aspects' are marked as 'No'.

Enhances the perceived value and positive impact of the project.
Address Ambiguity with Comprehensive Assumptions
HøjMedium indsats

Where tender requirements are vague or missing (e.g., technical capability, financial requirements), clearly state your assumptions and the comprehensive approach you will take to address these aspects. This demonstrates proactivity and a robust understanding of project execution.

Mitigates risks associated with unclear requirements and showcases a thorough approach.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position the bid as the most informed and practical solution for the Lithuanian healthcare system, leveraging unparalleled international experience that is directly transferable and adaptable. Emphasize a partnership approach focused on co-creation and sustainable implementation, rather than a purely advisory role.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding financial requirements.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

12 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
PD.7z

This document contains the technical specification for consulting services to develop and test a payment model for healthcare institutions based on achieved results, and a bidder's declaration regarding national security requirements.

Vis
1_Techninė specifikacija (Technical Specification).docxDOC
1_Techninė specifikacija (Technical Specifica... -- 26.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
3_Tiekėjo deklaracija(Supplier’s Declaration).docxDOC
3_Tiekėjo deklaracija(Supplier’s Declaration)... -- 23.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
4_Terminai (Terms).docxDOC
4_Terminai (Terms).docx -- 24.5 KB

No content extracted

Vis
5_Pasiūlymo forma (Proposal Form).docxDOC
5_Pasiūlymo forma (Proposal Form).docx -- 47.5 KB

No content extracted

Vis
6_Eksperto pažymos forma(Expert’s Statement Form).docxDOC
6_Eksperto pažymos forma(Expert’s Statement F... -- 32.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.1_Sutarties BS(General Contract Conditions).docxDOC
7.1_Sutarties BS(General Contract Conditions)... -- 77.2 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.2_Sutarties SS (Special Conditions of the Contract).docxDOC
7.2_Sutarties SS (Special Conditions of the C... -- 41.9 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.3._Susitarimas dėl duomenų tvarkymo(Data Processing Agreement).docxDOC
7.3._Susitarimas dėl duomenų tvarkymo(Data Pr... -- 30.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
Pirkimo sąlygos (Procurement Conditions).docxDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos (Procurement Conditions).docx -- 89.7 KB

No content extracted

Vis
Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6996042_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for an open procedure, requiring bidders to submit a file.

Vis
2_EBVPD (espd-request).zipZIP
2_EBVPD (espd-request).zip -- 77.4 KB

This document contains a proposal form and expert statement form for tendering international expert consultation services, along with general contract conditions.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for international expert consulting services is generally well-structured but lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and clarity. While it adheres to EU procurement standards and utilizes e-procurement, further information would enhance its quality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general EU procurement directives (2014/24/EU) and utilizes e-procurement. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of reveal dates for submitted proposals is a minor procedural gap. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Missing reveal date for submitted proposals
Klarhed80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, outlining the need for international expert consulting services for a healthcare payment model project. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The tender documents are available, but their specific content regarding requirements is not fully extracted, leaving some ambiguity.

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detailed content extraction from tender documents
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open and utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, indicating fairness. However, the undisclosed value and lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential contradiction or missing information regarding the submission process. Financing information is not detailed.

Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Lack of detailed financing information
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active' and there are no noted disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of an active tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate these factors.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of procurement object
Adherence to EU procurement directive
E-procurement enabled
Adequate documentation provided

Bekymringer

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Ambiguity in submission process details

Anbefalinger

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide explicit instructions.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline