Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

MALDI-TOF System

Åben
Frist
6 dage tilbage
April 10, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
021798-2026
Værdi
£250,000
Lokation
Eastern Scotland, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 11, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 03, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 10, 2026

Budget
£250,000
Varighed
50 måneder
Lokation
Eastern Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Købs-, installations- og servicekontrakt for et MALDI-TOF-system til Easter Bush Patologi ved University of Edinburgh.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a MALDI-TOF System is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall clarity and completeness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a clear procedure (Open procedure) and providing a CPV code. The absence of disputes and a clear status ('active') are positive. The deadline, while potentially short, is not explicitly flagged as unreasonable within the provided data. The lack of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the required goods and services is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the critical issue of missing evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The AI-extracted requirements suggest a comprehensive set of expected documents. However, the lack of accessible document content (0 documents with content/summaries) is a significant gap, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are objective in principle (though not specified). The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator of fairness. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not explicitly provided, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline) are logical within the context of an active tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a lower score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear basic information and title
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure and e-procurement characteristic
CPV code provided

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible document content
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents accessible with content or summaries.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with e-procurement.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline