Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Bygningskompleks hus for advokat Romualdas Dulskis (u.k. KVR 48304), Kaunas bykommune,

Åben
Frist
32 dage tilbage
Maj 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
6782107
Værdi
€21,370
Lokation
Kaunas County, Litauen
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 23, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Maj 07, 2026

Åbning af udbud

Maj 07, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€21,370
Varighed
10 måneder
Lokation
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€131,412
Gns. Tilbud
3.9
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
98%
2,076 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Bygningskompleks hus for advokat Romualdas Dulskis (u.k. KVR 48304), Kaunas bykommune,

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

65%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender seeks architectural and engineering services for a specific building complex. Given the low estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria, a strategy focused on demonstrating clear technical capability, competitive pricing, and efficient project delivery will be crucial. Proactive engagement and a well-structured, compliant bid are key to success.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Proven expertise in complex building assessments and architectural services for historical or unique structures.

Efficient and cost-effective project delivery within the specified timeframe.

Unwavering commitment to compliance and meticulous bid preparation.

Nøglemuligheder
Low estimated value may deter larger competitors, creating a more manageable competitive landscape.
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria suggests that a strong, compliant bid that meets all mandatory requirements will be highly weighted.
The specific nature of the building (lawyer Romualdas Dulskis's complex) may favor bidders with experience in culturally significant or historically relevant properties.
Nøgleudfordringer
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements for all stated criteria and present a clear, logical, and comprehensive proposal that demonstrates superior understanding and capability. Assume price and technical capability will be heavily weighted.

Potential for a high number of bids due to the open procurement type, despite the low value.

Ensure absolute bid accuracy and completeness to avoid disqualification. Highlight unique selling points and experience clearly and concisely.

The tender documents are primarily focused on exclusion grounds, implying a strict compliance-driven evaluation.

Meticulously review and address all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all supporting documentation is accurate, up-to-date, and directly addresses the tender's stated needs.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with proven experience in heritage building assessments, renovations, or similar complex structures. They should possess a strong understanding of Lithuanian building regulations and a capacity for efficient project management within a defined budget and timeline.
Nøglekrav
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated experience with similar historical or culturally significant building complexes in Lithuania.
A clear and concise project execution plan that highlights efficiency and adherence to the 10-month duration.
Competitive pricing that reflects value for money without compromising quality.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment or sustainable material sourcing if applicable to the project scope, even if it's a minor addition to demonstrate forward-thinking.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Technical Capability

Provide detailed examples of past projects that align with the description of the building complex. Highlight the expertise of the team members who will be assigned to this project, emphasizing relevant qualifications and experience.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that is realistic for the scope of work but also attractive. Ensure all costs are clearly itemized and justified. Consider offering a slight premium for exceptional quality or a very competitive price if margins allow.

Compliance

Treat all mandatory requirements as critical. Double-check all documentation against the ESPD and any other stated requirements. Ensure the submission is error-free and adheres to all formatting and deadline specifications.

Anbefalinger6
Thoroughly Address Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
KritiskHøj indsats

Carefully review Document 4 ('Tiekėjų pasalinimo pagrindai') and ensure all conditions for exclusion are understood and demonstrably avoided. Provide all requested supporting documents for eligibility and capability.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Assume Price and Technical Capability are Key
HøjMedium indsats

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, focus on presenting a strong technical proposal that clearly demonstrates capability and a competitive, value-driven price. Structure the bid to highlight these aspects prominently.

Maximizes chances of being selected if these are implicitly weighted heavily.
Highlight Niche Experience
MediumMedium indsats

Emphasize any experience with heritage buildings, legal professional properties, or complex architectural assessments. This specific context can be a strong differentiator.

Sets the bidder apart from general architectural firms.
Meticulous Bid Preparation and Review
HøjHøj indsats

Given the strictness implied by exclusion grounds, conduct multiple internal reviews of the entire bid package for accuracy, completeness, and compliance before submission. Pay close attention to the ESPD (espd-request.xml and .pdf).

Reduces risk of errors and disqualification.
Clarify Ambiguities
MediumLav indsats

If any aspect of the tender requirements is unclear, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels, well in advance of the submission deadline.

Ensures accurate bid submission and avoids misinterpretations.
Consider Optional Social Value Statement
LavLav indsats

Although not required, a brief, genuine statement on local engagement or sustainable practices can add a positive touch, especially if it aligns with the bidder's ethos.

Minor positive impression, no significant impact on evaluation.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position the bid as the most compliant and technically sound option, emphasizing a deep understanding of the specific building's context and requirements. Highlight efficiency and cost-effectiveness as key benefits of selecting your firm.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

12 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

2 priedas „Pasiūlymo forma“DOC
2 priedas Pasiulymo forma.docx

This document contains the "Offer Form" template, which bidders must fill out and submit as part of their proposal for legal services related to the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

Vis
3.1 priedas sutarties „Bendrosios sąlygos“DOC
3.1. priedas Bendrosios salygos (1).docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a services purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy.

Vis
3.2 priedas sutarties „Specialiosios sąlygos“DOC
3.2. priedas SU Specialiosios salygos (1).doc...

This document contains the special conditions for the service purchase and sale agreement for the legal professional Romualdas Dulskis's building complex.

Vis
4 priedas „Tiekėjų pasalinimo pagrindai“DOC
4 priedas Tiekeju pasalinimo pagrindai (1).do...

This document outlines the grounds for excluding bidders from a procurement procedure, specifying that supporting documents are generally requested only from the most economically advantageous bidder.

Vis
6 priedas „Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos reikalavimai“DOC
6 priedas Tiekeju kvalifikacijos reikalavimai...

This document outlines the supplier qualification requirements, including technical and professional capacity, documentation, and the use of subcontractors or third parties.

Vis
7 priedas „Įvykdytų sutarčių sąrašas“DOC
7 priedas Įvykdytu sutarciu sąrašas.docx

This document is a template for listing completed contracts, required as Annex 7 for the procurement of legal services for the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

Vis
8 priedas „Specialistų sąrašas“DOC
8 priedas Specialistu sąrašas.docx

This document is a mandatory list of specialists responsible for the execution of the procurement contract, as per Appendix 8 of the tender conditions.

Vis
Konkurso sąlygos Dulskio namasDOC
Konkurso sąlygos Dulskio namas.docx

This document contains the tender conditions for simplified open procurement of applied research services for the Romualdas Dulskis lawyer's building complex.

Vis
espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.6 KB

No content extracted

Vis
NoticePDF
Notice_6782107.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for architectural, engineering, and research services for the Romualdas Dulskis lawyer's building complex in Kaunas, Lithuania.

Vis
README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML and PDF format, likely related to a tender for legal services for the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

Vis
espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 103.0 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to a tender for legal services.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for architectural, engineering, and research services exhibits good overall quality, with strong clarity and fairness. However, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and has some practical limitations regarding submission.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows a standard open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes required elements like CPV codes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the estimated value, and no disputes are noted. The overall legal framework seems sound.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the service is clear, and various documents outline specific requirements, including qualification, exclusion grounds, and offer forms. The conditions are generally well-documented.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. A significant number of documents are attached, covering qualification, contract terms, and offer forms. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender provides full access to documentation and discloses the estimated value. While criteria are not fully detailed (e.g., evaluation), the process aims for objective selection through qualification requirements and exclusion grounds. It utilizes e-procurement.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs indirectly through attachment listings. The contract duration is clear, and financing information is presumed available. However, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not explicitly detailed, and the 'opening date' is close to the submission deadline.

No explicit e-submission mechanism detailed
Opening date is very close to submission deadline
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated correctly. Dates appear logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit green procurement clauses
Absence of social criteria inclusion

Styrker

Clear documentation of requirements and qualification criteria
Good overall clarity and fairness
Use of e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Bekymringer

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detail on e-submission mechanism
No explicit sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide explicit instructions or links for the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability elements into future tenders.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline