Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Rammeaftale om Commissioning-ledelse

Åben
Frist
4 dage tilbage
April 08, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Andet
Reference
00161444-2026
Værdi
kr2,200,000
Lokation
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 09, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 01, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 08, 2026

Budget
kr2,200,000
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Hovedstaden
Type
Andet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

På Havnegade 5 i København ligger Danmarks Nationalbanks ikoniske hovedsæde. Det skal over en længere årrække gennemgå en større og nødvendig restaurering. Bygningen er tegnet af arkitekten Arne Jacobsen og opført i årene 1965-1978, og i 2009 blev bygningen fredet. Alle opgaverne i projektet skal derfor løses i tæt dialog med Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen under hensyntagen til, at bygningen er fredet. Nationalbanken og projektets totalrådgiver varetager denne dialog. Nationalbanken har opdelt det sa

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

14 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (5)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-08 11:00:00.
--The tender is for a framework agreement for Commissioning management.
--One framework agreement will be entered into with one advisor.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per the Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally established and registered to operate.
--Bidders must demonstrate the necessary legal capacity to perform the contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must have experience in providing Commissioning management services.
--Bidders must have experience with Commissioning management in accordance with DS3090.
--Bidders must have experience working on heritage-listed buildings, particularly in close dialogue with heritage authorities (Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the framework agreement is DKK 2,200,000, with a maximum value of DKK 2,700,000.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Commissioning management services for a significant heritage building restoration is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is implied by the heritage listing and dialogue with authorities.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the project and the required services (Commissioning management according to DS3090) is clear. Technical requirements are detailed, outlining experience with heritage buildings and specific sub-projects. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. The description provides context for the restoration project. However, crucial details like the contract duration are missing, and the availability of tender documents is via an external URL without direct content preview.

Missing contract duration
No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated and maximum values are disclosed. Technical requirements are specific but appear to be based on the project's needs rather than tailored to a single company. E-procurement is indicated.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a URL for tender documents. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. The lack of contract duration is a significant practical omission.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, with the publication date preceding the submission deadline. No suspension or disputes are indicated.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear technical requirements for heritage restoration
Open procedure for broad participation
Detailed project description
E-procurement utilized

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
External tender document link without preview

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
2. Include the contract duration in the tender documentation.
3. Provide direct access or a summary of tender document content.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline