Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

020363 – Newbridge Lane leveringsstrategi

Åben
Frist
13 dage tilbage
April 17, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
025958-2026
Værdi
£108,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 20, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 10, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 17, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£108,000
Varighed
10 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Stockport MDC og Stockport Council søger et udviklingsrådgivningsteam (inklusive arkitektonisk input) til at rådgive om og fremlægge en leveringsstrategi for Newbridge Lane-området i den østlige del af byens centrum.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a delivery strategy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. A clear CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required service (development advisory including architectural input for a delivery strategy) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the critical issue of 'Documents with content/summaries: 0' significantly impacts completeness, as bidders cannot fully understand the scope without access to the tender documents. The 'reveal date' is also missing.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned as requirements. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied by the structure, though not explicitly stated as mandatory.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of accessible tender documents and the absence of explicit mention of e-submission (though implied by 'active' status) reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
Missing financing info
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline and contract start) are logically ordered.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and deadline disclosed
CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

No accessible tender documents with content
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full access to tender documents with clear content or summaries.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline