Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Re-Imagine Engineering Renovering. Millennium Point, Birmingham

Åben
Frist
11 dage tilbage
April 15, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
027976-2026
Værdi
£350,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 08, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 15, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

April 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£350,000
Varighed
16 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

BCU inviterer passende kvalificerede leverandører til at byde på renoveringen af Re-Imagine Engineering Facility på dets Millennium Point uddannelsessted. Stedadresse - Millennium Point Building, Cardigan Street, Birmingham, B4 7BD.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Suitably qualified suppliers
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detail in specific requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition', which implies a simplified process. The absence of disputes and the active status are positive indicators. However, the 'Missing reveal date' is a minor procedural concern.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The title and description clearly state the project's objective and location. The CPV code is provided, aiding in classification. However, the lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the scope and expectations.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. However, the absence of detailed requirements and the fact that none of the tender documents have content summaries significantly reduce the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold procurement. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which is a significant drawback for fairness. There is no indication of e-procurement, which could limit accessibility.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding financing and the absence of an e-submission mechanism reduce its practicality for bidders. The availability of documents is mentioned, but their content is not accessible, hindering practical assessment.

No e-submission
No financing info
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any inconsistencies. The absence of disputes and suspension further supports data consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Open competition procedure
Active status with no disputes

Bekymringer

Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission mechanism
No content available for tender documents
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission process and providing accessible tender document content.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline