Udbud dynamisk indkøbssystem på håndværkerydelser til Aalborg Universitet

This tender for a dynamic purchasing system for craft services at Aalborg University is active but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial specifics, impacting its completeness and clarity. However, it benefits from clear identification and available documentation.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, indicated by the presence of a CPV code and an open procedure. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential issues with the submission deadline's reasonableness (given the long duration until 2029) could raise concerns. The lack of disclosed value also hinders a full assessment of regulatory compliance regarding thresholds.

The title and description clearly state the purpose of closing a dynamic purchasing system for craft services. However, the lack of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as missing evaluation criteria, significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

While basic information like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing contract duration, and the absence of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission). The lack of document content available for review also impacts completeness.

The tender is generally fair as it is an open procedure with a clear reference number and organization. The availability of documents and the e-procurement characteristic are positive. However, the lack of disclosed value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not fully understand the basis of selection.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive for practicality. However, the absence of a contract start date, financing information, and the lack of detailed submission requirements make it difficult for potential bidders to assess the practical implications of participating. The provided description is also very brief.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (publication and deadline) are logically presented, although the submission deadline is very far in the future.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.