Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

TVFCS Kommando & Kontrol

Åben
Frist
197 dage tilbage
Oktober 18, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
018698-2026
Værdi
£13,200,000
Lokation
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 02, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Oktober 11, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Oktober 18, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Oktober 18, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£13,200,000
Varighed
84 måneder
Lokation
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Thames Valley Fire Control Service (TVFCS) igangsætter en konkurrencepræget fleksibel procedure til udskiftning af sit Kommando & Kontrol (C&C) system. TVFCS er et tre-service samarbejde mellem Oxfordshire Fire & Rescue Service, Buckinghamshire Fire & Rescue Service og Royal Berkshire Fire & Rescue Service. Oxfordshire County Council foretager dette udbud på vegne af de øvrige brandvæsener. Siden idriftsættelsen i 2015 har TVFCS leveret en kritisk delt nødberedskabscentral, der håndterer 999-opkald og mobiliserer ressourcer i Thames Valley-regionen og betjener en befolkning på ca. 2,5 millioner indbyggere. Det nuværende C&C-system (NEC Vision Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) og DS3000 Integrated Communication Control System (ICCS)) nærmer sig slutningen af sin levetid, hvor nøglekomponenter i infrastrukturen vil blive usupportede inden 2029. Udskiftningsprojektet sigter mod at sikre kontinuiteten af lovpligtige nødberedskabstjenester, forbedre operationel modstandsdygtighed og understøtte fremtidig innovation gennem en moderne, modulær løsning. Kontraktens startdato er planlagt til den 19. oktober 2026, efterfulgt af en overgangsperiode med en serviceopstartsdato senest den 1. april 2028. Indsendte priser skal være for en 10-årig periode, der starter fra den planlagte kontraktstartdato den 19.10.26, og skal inkludere den indledende periode på 7 år + 3 valgfrie forlængelser. Alle fase 2-spørgsmål vil blive evalueret ved hjælp af en Price per Quality Point (PQP) metode, som er yderligere beskrevet i ITT. For at undgå tvivl betyder Indsendt Pris den samlede pris for hele kontraktperioden, inklusive eventuelle valgfrie forlængelser, implementering, licenser/abonnementer, support, hosting og dobbelt drift som specificeret i pris skabelonen. PQP beregnes til to decimaler ved brug af standard afrunding. I tilfælde af uafgjort vil rangeringen blive bestemt ved: (1) højere Total Kvalitetsscore; derefter (2) højere Kernekvalitetsscore; derefter (3) lavere Indsendt Pris. Pris pr. Kvalitetspunkt (PQP) beregnes som: Indsendt Pris ÷ Total Kvalitetsscore (TQS) = PQP

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

24 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (8)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (6)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiel (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Stage 2 questions shall be evaluated using a Price per Quality Point (PQP) methodology.
--PQP is calculated as: Submitted Price ÷ Total Quality Score (TQS) = PQP.
--PQP shall be calculated to two decimal places using standard rounding.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be a Competitive Flexible Procedure procurement.
--Must be able to replace the Command & Control (C&C) system for Thames Valley Fire Control Service (TVFCS).
--Must be able to support a tri-service collaboration (Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Royal Berkshire Fire & Rescue Services).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Ability to replace the current C&C system (NEC Vision Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and DS3000 Integrated Communication Control System (ICCS)).
--Ability to provide a modern, modular solution.
--Ability to ensure continuity of statutory emergency response services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Pricing submitted must be for a 10-year period commencing from a targeted contract start date of 19/10/26.
--Pricing must include the initial period of 7 years + 3 optional extensions.
--Submitted Price means the total whole-life price for the full Contract Term, including any optional extensions, implementation, licences/subscriptions, support, hosting and dual running as specified in the pricing template.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a Command & Control system replacement is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a defined evaluation methodology. However, it lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria beyond the PQP calculation and has limited information on sustainability aspects.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender utilizes a competitive flexible procedure, which is a valid procurement type. The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the submission deadline appears unusually long given the contract start date, which could be a point of contention or indicate a lack of urgency. The absence of a reveal date for documents is a minor procedural oversight.

Submission deadline significantly later than contract start date.
Missing reveal date for tender documents.
Klarhed80/100

The description of the project's purpose, scope, and the collaborating services is clear. The PQP evaluation methodology is explained, providing a structured approach to scoring. However, specific detailed evaluation criteria beyond the PQP calculation are not explicitly provided in the excerpt, which could lead to ambiguity.

Lack of explicit detailed evaluation criteria beyond PQP methodology.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description provides context for the procurement. However, the crucial tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, significantly impacting completeness. The contract start date and service commencement date are targeted, which is acceptable but less definitive than fixed dates.

Tender documents are not accessible or summarized.
Targeted contract start and service commencement dates.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender appears fair, with a clear PQP methodology that balances price and quality. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied by the submission deadline format, though not explicitly stated as mandatory.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and a targeted start date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The submission deadline is provided, but the lack of accessible documents and explicit mention of e-submission platform limits practicality. The pricing requirement for a 10-year period is clearly stated.

Lack of explicit mention of e-submission platform.
Financing information not detailed.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided, while some are targeted, are logically presented. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The contract duration aligns with the pricing requirement for a 10-year period (7 years + 3 optional extensions).

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as specific evaluation criteria or requirements within the provided text. The focus is primarily on functional and technical replacement of the C&C system.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social value criteria.

Styrker

Clear project description and objectives.
Well-defined PQP evaluation methodology.
Appropriate CPV code and NUTS code provided.
Estimated value and contract duration specified.

Bekymringer

Inaccessible tender documents.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Discrepancy between submission deadline and contract start date.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide access to or summaries of all tender documents.
2. Clearly outline all evaluation criteria beyond the PQP calculation.
3. Incorporate and specify sustainability and innovation requirements.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline