Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Rammeaftale for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) Bedste Interesser Vurderingsmand

Åben
Frist
3 dage tilbage
April 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
019462-2026
Værdi
£641,160
Lokation
Lancashire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 04, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 31, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 07, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

April 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£641,160
Varighed
12 måneder
Lokation
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) er en juridisk ramme, hvorunder den lokale myndighed (Blackpool Council) fungerer som tilsynsmyndighed for at godkende frihedsberøvelser af servicebrugere, som er statens ansvar. Blackpool Council ønsker at invitere egnede udbydere til at indsende et tilbud på rammeaftalen for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) Bedste Interesser Vurderingsmand.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a Best Interest Assessor Framework is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a reasonable range for below-threshold procurements.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the service required (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Best Interest Assessor Framework) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly reduce its completeness.

No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission
Documents with content/summaries: 0
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection are not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed objectively.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of document content make the practical execution of the bidding process less straightforward.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are consistent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Appropriate CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed submission requirements
No content available for tender documents
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission procedures.
3. Upload content or summaries for all tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline