Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

SKDC-1640 Parkeringspladsreparationer - Wharf Road Alle Niveauer for South Kesteven District Council

Åben
Frist
19 dage tilbage
April 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026559-2026
Værdi
£360,000
Lokation
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 24, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£360,000
Varighed
6 måneder
Lokation
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Arbejdet består af renovering og diverse reparationsarbejder på alle niveauer af parkeringspladsen ved Wharf Road for at opfylde forpligtelser vedrørende forringelse. Parkeringspladsen vil generelt forblive i drift under arbejdet. Særlig opmærksomhed skal rettes mod vedligeholdelse af brandudgange, sikkerhed og adskillelse af arbejdet fra parkeringspladsaktiviteter samt offentligheden, når de bruger parkeringspladsen. Arbejdet skal overholde lejevilkårene og opretholde parkeringspladsens brug for beboere og offentligheden.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

13 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be able to undertake redecoration and sundry remedial repair works.
--Must be able to maintain fire exits, security, and segregation of works from car park activities and the public.
--Must comply with lease terms.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Ability to perform redecoration works.
--Ability to perform sundry remedial repair works.
--Experience in working within an operational car park environment.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for car park repairs is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the availability of tender documents is limited.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are reported.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the need for redecoration and remedial repairs in an operational car park. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration is present. The contract start date is specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of detailed submission requirements reduce the completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objectively defined. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of e-submission might be a minor drawback for some.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is not detailed. The primary concern for practicality is the lack of explicit e-submission, which could complicate the process for bidders. The availability of documents is also a concern.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of works
Open competition procedure
Disclosure of estimated value
Defined eligibility and technical requirements

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit e-submission
Absence of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with clear content for bidders.
3. Consider incorporating e-submission options for improved practicality.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline