Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Renovering af Rhodes Minnis Legeplads

Åben
Frist
62 dage tilbage
Juni 06, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
028386-2026
Værdi
£72,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 27, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Maj 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Juni 06, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 02, 2026

Budget
£72,000
Varighed
1 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Renovering af legeplads for at inkludere mere inkluderende og tilgængeligt udstyr.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for playground refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting clarity and completeness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure is stated as 'Open procedure'. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission that could lead to procedural challenges.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Klarhed80/100

The description of the work is clear, focusing on inclusive and accessible equipment. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed. However, the lack of document content and specific evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of the detailed requirements.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. The main deficiency is the lack of accessible tender documents with content, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and capability are listed. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be a concern, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is also not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission specified
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission and contract start are consistent with the contract duration.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value disclosed
Open procedure indicated
Basic description provided

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Lack of sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide access to tender documents with detailed content.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline