Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Levering af brænde til Dobele Kommunes og dens institutioners behov

Åben
Frist
3 dage tilbage
April 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Leverancer
Reference
168430
Værdi
€32,988
Lokation
Zemgale, Letland
Udgivet
Marts 17, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 17, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 31, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 07, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 07, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€32,988
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
Zemgale
Type
Leverancer
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€24,627
Gns. Tilbud
2.3
Konkurrence
Lav
SMV Vindere
100%
2,503 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Levering af brænde til Dobele Kommunes og dens institutioners behov

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

70%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender presents a moderate opportunity for experienced firewood suppliers. The key to winning lies in demonstrating unwavering reliability, competitive pricing, and meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements, especially given the lack of specified evaluation criteria which suggests a strong emphasis on compliance and basic suitability.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Reliable and Consistent Supply: Guaranteeing uninterrupted firewood delivery to Dobele Municipality and its institutions.

Value for Money: Offering competitive pricing while maintaining high-quality standards.

Seamless Execution: Demonstrating a clear understanding of the contract and a commitment to efficient, compliant delivery.

Nøglemuligheder
Lack of specified evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and offering a competitive price.
The short 2-month duration may favor bidders with readily available stock and efficient logistics.
The relatively low estimated value (32988.02) might deter larger, less agile competitors, potentially reducing competition.
Nøgleudfordringer
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize for specific scoring, requiring a focus on meeting all minimums and offering a strong price.

Ensure absolute compliance with all mandatory requirements and present the most competitive price possible. Focus on clarity and completeness in all submission documents.

Potential for a highly competitive bid due to the straightforward nature of the supply and the lack of complex requirements.

Thoroughly research potential competitors and benchmark pricing. Highlight any existing local presence or established relationships with the municipality.

Ensuring the quality of firewood meets the municipality's standards, as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.

Clearly articulate the sourcing, drying, and quality control processes for the firewood. Provide any relevant certifications or documentation if available.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A local or regional firewood supplier with a proven track record of consistent, timely deliveries, a robust supply chain, and the capacity to meet the specified volume and quality requirements. The ideal bidder will also have a strong understanding of municipal procurement processes and a commitment to clear communication.
Nøglekrav
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds.
Meeting all eligibility requirements (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija').
Demonstrating sufficient technical capability (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija').
Fulfilling all financial requirements (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija').
Adhering to all submission requirements (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums', 'Main tender page').
Meeting the quality and specification requirements for firewood (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija').
Ensuring timely delivery within the 2-month duration.
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Local presence and understanding of regional needs.
Demonstrated capacity for immediate and consistent supply.
Exceptional customer service and communication throughout the contract period.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly requested, consider a statement about prioritizing local sourcing of firewood, if applicable, to support the regional economy. This can be a subtle differentiator.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Mandatory Requirements Compliance

Achieve 100% compliance across all exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. Any non-compliance will likely lead to disqualification.

Price

Offer the most competitive price that is still profitable, as price is likely a significant factor in the absence of other weighted criteria.

Anbefalinger6
Thoroughly review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
KritiskHøj indsats

This document is central to understanding all mandatory requirements, including exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capabilities, and financial standing. Meticulous review and adherence are paramount.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Focus on Price Competitiveness
KritiskMedium indsats

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, the price will likely be a primary determinant. Calculate a competitive yet sustainable price, factoring in all costs and a reasonable profit margin.

Maximizes the chance of winning if price is the main deciding factor.
Highlight Local Presence and Reliability
HøjMedium indsats

If the bidder operates within or near Dobele, emphasize this local advantage for faster response times and a better understanding of local needs. Showcase a proven history of reliable, timely deliveries.

Builds trust and positions the bidder as a convenient and dependable partner.
Prepare Comprehensive Submission Documents
HøjMedium indsats

Ensure all required documents, as specified in 'Nolikums' and 'Main tender page', are complete, accurate, and submitted by the deadline. Pay close attention to formatting and any specific submission portals.

Avoids administrative disqualification and demonstrates professionalism.
Verify Firewood Quality Assurance
MediumMedium indsats

Clearly articulate the process for ensuring the firewood meets the required specifications (e.g., moisture content, type of wood). If possible, include any supporting documentation or certifications.

Prevents potential disputes or rejection of goods.
Consider Local Sourcing Statement
LavLav indsats

If applicable, include a brief statement about prioritizing local sourcing of firewood. This can be a subtle positive differentiator without adding significant cost or complexity.

Adds a minor positive impression without explicit requirement.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most reliable and cost-effective supplier for Dobele Municipality. Emphasize a streamlined process from order to delivery, ensuring minimal administrative burden for the client.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

7 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Details to be found in 'Nolikums']
--[Details to be found in 'Main tender page']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168430_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260317135211.pdf -- 96.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of firewood for the Dobele municipality and its institutions, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal requirements.

Vis
NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_DNP_2026_18K_.docx -- 80.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender process by the Dobele Municipality for the supply of firewood.

Vis
Līguma projektsDOC
P5_Liguma_projekts.doc -- 163.5 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the supply of firewood for the needs of the Dobele municipality and its institutions.

Vis
Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the supply of firewood for the Dobele municipality and its institutions, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for firewood supply is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and accessible documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the complexity. No existing disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed through the open procedure.

Klarhed80/100

The tender title and description are clear. The requirements are documented, but specific evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated within the provided overview, necessitating a deeper dive into the linked documents.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified in the overview
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including value and duration. However, the location details are duplicated, and some crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are only referenced to external documents, potentially impacting the ease of a complete understanding without accessing all linked files.

Duplicated location information
Reliance on external documents for detailed requirements
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are implied to be objective within the referenced documents. No obvious tailoring to specific companies is apparent.

Potential for restricted document access (as flagged)
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

While the tender is active and has a contract draft, the core requirement of e-submission is listed as a concern, suggesting potential limitations or a lack of explicit confirmation within the extracted data. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

E-submission not explicitly confirmed as implemented
Missing contract start date
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not flagged as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green or social procurement considerations
No innovation focus mentioned

Styrker

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value)
Open procedure with CPV code provided
Contract draft available
Active e-procurement characteristics

Bekymringer

Evaluation criteria not explicitly specified
Reliance on external documents for detailed requirements
Sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) are absent

Anbefalinger

1. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or summary.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability or social clauses where applicable.
3. Ensure all necessary documents for a full understanding are easily accessible and not presented as potentially restricted.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline