Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

RFQ 2025/73 - PEACEPLUS Fællesskabsledet program for delt historie og kultur Hellige Steder i Slieve Gullion

Åben
Frist
5 dage tilbage
April 09, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
027909-2026
Værdi
£15,738
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 02, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 09, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 03, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£15,738
Varighed
8 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Newry, Mourne & Down District Council (NMDDC) handlingsplan 'Thriving Together' er udviklet af PEACEPLUS Partnership ved hjælp af en co-design tilgang, der involverer omfattende engagement med lokalsamfundet og andre nøgleinteressenter, herunder lovpligtige udbydere, offentlige organer, virksomheder og Council DEA (District Electoral Area) Forums. Tilbudsgivere opfordres til at indsende forslag til design, koordination og levering af et tværkommunalt festivalprogram, der kulminerer i oprettelsen af en kulturarvssamling, der viser de historiske kirker, kapeller og mødehuse på tværs af Slieve Gullion DEA.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

8 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals are to be submitted.
--Duration: 8 months
--Deadline: 2026-04-09T13:00:00+01:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Tenderers are invited to submit proposals.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Design, coordination, and delivery of a cross community festival programme.
--Culminating in the creation of a Heritage Collection showcasing historic churches, chapels, and meeting houses across the Slieve Gullion DEA.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 15737.95 EUR

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for a community heritage program is generally well-structured with clear objectives, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation. The value is modest, and the duration is reasonable for the scope.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is broad but acceptable. No disputes are noted. The procedure is described as 'open competition'. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some standards.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the objective of designing, coordinating, and delivering a cross-community festival and heritage collection. The technical requirements are directly derived from this description. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity for tenderers.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the crucial aspect of tender documents having no available content or summaries significantly hinders completeness, as potential bidders cannot fully assess the scope or requirements without them.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not explicitly detailed for evaluation, are implied by the technical requirements. The process is described as below threshold open competition, suggesting a level playing field. Access to full documents is a concern due to their unavailability.

No document content available
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and financing is implied by the estimated value. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document content reduce practicality for potential bidders who need to understand the full scope before preparing a submission.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. The CPV code is very general and does not indicate specific sustainability goals.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear project objective and scope
Open competition procedure
All basic information present
Modest estimated value suitable for smaller providers

Bekymringer

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission method specified
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full tender documents with clear content and summaries.
2. Specify evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the submission method, preferably through an e-procurement platform.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline