Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

AT1487 Levering af uafhængige plejefamilieagenturer

Åben
Frist
10 dage tilbage
April 14, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
022666-2026
Værdi
£118,000,000
Lokation
United Kingdom, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 13, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 07, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 14, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£118,000,000
Varighed
108 måneder
Lokation
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Luton Council leder indkøbet på vegne af de fire lokale myndighedspartnere, Central Bedfordshire Council, Bedford Borough Council og Hertfordshire County Council (Partnerskabets Myndigheder). Luton, Bedford, Central Bedfordshire og Hertfordshire Councils arbejder samarbejdende for at genåbne og udvide listen over godkendte udbydere (APL) for uafhængige plejefamilieagenturer til at betjene alle myndigheder. APL vil støtte myndighederne i at levere passende plejefamilieplaceringer på det rette tidspunkt, på det rette sted og med den rette støtte, for at forbedre de samlede resultater for børn i pleje. Vi søger uafhængige plejefamilieydelser, som skal være i Beds/Herts og omkringliggende områder, f.eks. Buckinghamshire, Milton Keynes, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire. Udbydere skal være Ofsted-registrerede som 'God' eller 'Fremragende' og handle i overensstemmelse med vejledningen i 'Working Together to Safeguard Children' (2018) og enhver efterfølgende vejledning. Dette udbydes i henhold til 'Light Touch Regime' under Public Contract Regulations 2015, da den oprindelige APL blev udbudt, før Procurement Act 2023 trådte i kraft.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

7 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be Ofsted registered as Good or Outstanding.
--Must act in accordance with the guidance contained in Working Together to Safeguard Children (2018) and any subsequent guidance.
--Must provide Independent Fostering Agency provision in Beds/Herts and surrounding areas (eg Buckinghamshire, Milton Keynes, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements detailed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements detailed in the provided text]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Independent Foster Agencies is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical/financial requirements, and the availability of tender documents needs improvement.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. The mention of 'Light Touch Regime' suggests awareness of regulatory frameworks, though the specific application of the Procurement Act 2023 could be clearer. No disputes are reported.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the procurement's purpose and the partnership involved is clear. Eligibility requirements, such as Ofsted registration and geographical scope, are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Basic information like title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific technical and financial requirements reduce the overall completeness.

No document content available
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. Eligibility criteria are objective. The geographical scope is defined, but the lack of detailed technical and financial requirements could inadvertently favor larger or more established providers if not properly addressed in the full documentation.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear partnership and collaborative approach
Substantial estimated value and long contract duration
Objective eligibility criteria (Ofsted registration, geographical scope)
Use of e-procurement (indicated)

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed technical and financial requirements
No document content available
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Publish full tender documentation with specific technical and financial requirements.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline