Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Tværregionalt Projekt

Åben
Frist
80 dage tilbage
Juni 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
023565-2026
Værdi
£206,400,000
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 16, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Juni 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Juni 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 31, 2027

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£206,400,000
Varighed
60 måneder
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Tværregional kontrakt på vegne af Rådene i Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire, Milton Keynes, Reading, Bedford og Oxfordshire for at tilbyde bolig- og uddannelsestilbud til børn, vi passer på (CWCF), med komplekse sociale, adfærdsmæssige og uddannelsesmæssige behov. Tværregionalt Projekt (CRP) leverer terapeutiske boligpleje- og uddannelsestjenester for børn i alderen 11-17 år med komplekse behov, der opererer på tværs af 11 hjem i partneramter og tilbyder 36 pladser. En registreret specialskole, bestilt under en blokkontrakt, leverer uddannelse til elever i alderen 11-17 år – inklusive dem uden EHCP'er – på tværs af nøgletrin 3 til 5. Den nye service lanceres den 1. august 2027, startende med 36 pladser og potentielt udvidende med yderligere 28. Atten måneder inde i kontrakten kan partnere købe ekstra pladser når som helst i kontraktperioden.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

12 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (8)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Provide residential and educational provision for Children We Care For (CWCF) with complex social, behavioural and educational needs.
--Deliver therapeutic residential care and educational services for children aged 11–17 with complex needs.
--Operate across 11 homes in partner counties offering 36 placements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 206,400,000.0 EUR

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender outlines a significant contract for children's residential and educational services, with generally good clarity and completeness. However, it lacks crucial details on evaluation criteria and e-submission, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to be compliant with general procurement principles, with a clear CPV code and no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The competitive flexible procedure is a valid choice. However, the deadline might be perceived as tight given the complexity and value, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance.

Potential for a tight submission deadline given the contract's scope and value.
Klarhed80/100

The description of services, target beneficiaries, and scope is clear and well-articulated. The technical requirements are explicitly listed, providing a good understanding of the expected service delivery. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the status 'planning' suggests that not all final documents or detailed specifications are yet available, and the lack of content in the provided tender documents is a significant gap.

Lack of content in provided tender documents.
Status as 'planning' implies incomplete final documentation.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value, and the requirements seem objective and not tailored to specific companies. The use of a competitive flexible procedure is standard. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria and the lack of information regarding e-submission processes could be perceived as reducing transparency and fairness for potential bidders.

Absence of clear evaluation criteria may reduce transparency.
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. The estimated value is provided. However, the lack of information on e-submission and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly hinder practical application for potential bidders.

No clear indication of e-submission process.
Lack of document content requires significant follow-up.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logically structured, with a contract start date well after the submission deadline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided tender details. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social criteria.

Styrker

Clear service description and target group.
Detailed technical requirements.
Sufficient financial information provided.
Logically structured timeline.

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria.
No information on e-submission.
Lack of content in tender documents.
No explicit sustainability focus.

Anbefalinger

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Specify the e-submission process and platform.
3. Include sustainability and social value objectives.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline