Kontrakt for tværfaglige ingeniørrådgivningstjenester

This tender for multidisciplinary engineering consultancy services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting its overall quality.

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is within a reasonable timeframe for an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the need for engineering consultancy for a hybrid planning application. The AI-extracted requirements list key categories, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries is a major deficiency.

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are stated to be objective, though not detailed. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a minor concern for fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of accessible document URLs reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these important sustainability considerations.