Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Stockton on the Forest Primærskole Køkkenrenovering og oprettelse af interventionsrum 2026

Åben
Frist
23 dage tilbage
April 28, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
025935-2026
Værdi
£319,440
Lokation
North Yorkshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 20, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 21, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 28, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 19, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£319,440
Varighed
4 måneder
Lokation
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Byrådet i York har en mulighed for renovering af køkkenet på Stockton on the Forest Primærskole og oprettelse af et interventionsrum i 2026.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

5 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for school kitchen refurbishment offers a clear description and adequate financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting overall completeness and clarity.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, reference, deadline, value, and duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, and the tender documents are listed without content summaries, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

AI-extracted requirements section empty
Tender documents lack content summaries
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is provided. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor concern for fairness if not addressed in the full documents.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission mentioned
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, reference, deadline, value, and duration are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear project description
Specified estimated value and duration
Open competition procedure
Basic legal compliance

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detail in AI-extracted requirements
Tender documents without content summaries
No explicit mention of e-submission

Anbefalinger

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents have accessible content summaries or direct links.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide necessary links.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline