Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

EBC PR Cricket Way, Renovering af legeplads

Åben
Frist
9 dage tilbage
April 13, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
018817-2026
Værdi
£102,000
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 03, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 06, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 13, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

September 06, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£102,000
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Elmbridge Borough Council henvender sig til markedet for udskiftning af: Alt udendørs legeudstyr og ny gummivåd-støbt sikkerhedsoverflade på Cricket Way. Inden for Borough. For at blive taget i betragtning forventes tilbudsgivere at besøge stedet, før de indsender et detaljeret svar, for at sikre, at de opfylder udskiftningskravene og indsender et innovativt svar, der kan sikre overholdelse og værdi for pengene.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

10 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (2)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a detailed response.
--Submit an innovative response.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Tenderers are expected to visit the site prior to submitting a detailed response.
--Tenderers must submit an innovative response.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to replace all of the Outdoor Play Equipment.
--Ability to replace New Rubber Wet Pour Safety Surfacing.
--Ensure compliance with replacement requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for playground refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a specified CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the site visit requirement. No disputes are noted. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the required work (replacement of outdoor play equipment and safety surfacing) is clear. The requirement for an innovative response is stated, but the criteria for evaluating innovation are not detailed. The conditions for submission are generally understandable.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for innovation
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specific financial requirements or detailed exclusion grounds leave gaps. The submission deadline is present, but the contract start date is quite far in the future.

No document content available
Missing specific financial requirements
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open to all, and the value is disclosed. The requirement for a site visit is standard for this type of project and promotes fairness by ensuring all bidders have the same understanding of the site. The criteria for innovation are not specified, which could lead to subjective evaluation.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria for innovation
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a site visit requirement, which is practical for understanding the scope. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make it less practical for bidders to prepare their responses efficiently. The financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, although the gap between the submission deadline and contract start date is significant.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as a core requirement beyond a general call for an 'innovative response'. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

No document content available
Missing detailed evaluation criteria
No e-submission specified
Lack of explicit sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full tender documents with detailed content.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria, especially for innovation.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline