Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Medway Road Legeplads, Worcester

Åben
Frist
9 dage tilbage
April 13, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
022605-2026
Værdi
£120,000
Lokation
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 12, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 06, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 13, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£120,000
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Worcester City Council ønsker at engagere et specialiseret firma med passende erfaring, færdigheder og kompetencer til at designe og implementere forbedringer på det eksisterende legepladsanlæg, der ejes og administreres af Worcester City Council. De krævede resultater vil være: • Et skræddersyet, inspirerende legepladsområde i nabolaget, der passer ind i omgivelserne og forbedrer det lokale miljø; • At imødekomme lokalsamfundets behov ved at skabe et inkluderende rum for alle; • At støtte Rådets mål som en del af Worcester Play Plan. Obligatoriske ledsagede besøg på stedet. Manglende gennemførelse af et ledsaget besøg på stedet vil resultere i et ikke-konformt bud, og dit tilbud vil blive afvist. Tildelte datoer for besøg på stedet er 17., 18. og 19. marts. Se venligst Udbudsdokumenterne for yderligere information.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

11 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Mandatory accompanied site visits.
--Failure to carry out an accompanied site visit will result in a non-compliant bid and rejection.
--Allocated site visit dates: 17th, 18th and 19th March.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a specialist company with appropriate experience, skills and competencies.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Design and implement improvements at the existing play facility.
--Create a bespoke, inspiring, neighbourhood play space that fits in its surroundings and enhances the local environment.
--Create an inclusive space for all, meeting the needs of the local community.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text]

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for playground improvements is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and mandatory site visits. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and document access is limited.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and procedure type. Deadlines for site visits are provided, but the submission deadline's adequacy relative to the site visit dates (only 27 days between the last site visit date and submission deadline) could be a point of concern, though it falls within a reasonable range for below-threshold procurements. No disputes are noted. The absence of an 'intended reveal date' is a minor omission.

Klarhed80/100

The description of required outcomes is clear and articulates the vision for the play space, including inclusivity and community needs. The mandatory site visit requirement is explicitly stated with consequences for non-compliance. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, critical information is missing, particularly regarding the content of the procurement documents and the evaluation criteria. The fact that 'Documents with content/summaries: 0' is a significant drawback.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open competition and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The mandatory site visit requirement, while clearly communicated, might pose a logistical challenge for distant bidders but is applied equally. The requirements for experience, skills, and competencies are broad, not tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract duration of 2 months is specified. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission, a direct URL for documents, and financing details limits the practicality for potential bidders. The document access issue is a major hurdle.

No e-submission
No document URL provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract start date is logically after the submission deadline. No suspensions or disputes are reported, indicating consistency in the tender's status and lifecycle.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or AI-extracted requirements. The focus is purely on the functional and aesthetic improvement of the play area. The lack of any sustainability considerations results in a low score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of desired outcomes
Mandatory site visits ensure bidder understanding
Open competition procedure
All basic tender information is present

Bekymringer

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission mentioned
Lack of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide access to complete procurement documents.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation elements.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline