Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Levering af lægevagts- og akutbehandlingscentre på vegne af South Tyneside og Sunderland NHS FT

Åben
Frist
6 dage tilbage
April 10, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
024209-2026
Værdi
£3,900,000
Lokation
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 17, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 03, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 10, 2026

Budget
£3,900,000
Varighed
24 måneder
Lokation
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Integreret akutbehandlingscenter (UTC) og lægevagts (OOH) service med lokationer på Sunderland Royal Hospital og South Tyneside District Hospital

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for GP Out of Hours and Urgent Treatment Centres is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall transparency and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure, and there are no reported disputes. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the basic requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are listed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a complete understanding of the requirements.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. The absence of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential disconnect or an incomplete understanding of the process. The lack of accessible document content also reduces practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code and NUTS code provided
Open procedure with e-procurement noted

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential issues with e-submission process
Limited focus on sustainability

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible with content summaries.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline