Rammeaftale om rådgivning om forsyningskæder

This tender for a Supply Chain Consultancy Framework is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and relies on email for document access, impacting its practicality and fairness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is within a reasonable range for an open procedure. The absence of specific regulatory flags suggests compliance with standard procurement laws.

The tender clearly outlines the objective of establishing a framework for supply chain consultancy, specifying key areas of expertise required. The description of services is linked to ITT documents, which is a standard practice. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are also specified. However, the absence of accessible ITT documents directly within the tender notice, requiring an email request, reduces its completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses an open procedure, promoting fairness. The criteria for expertise are specific but not overly tailored to a single company. The primary concern for fairness is the reliance on email for accessing ITT documents, which could create a slight barrier compared to direct digital access.

The tender's practicality is hampered by the requirement to email for ITT documents, which is not a fully e-submission process. While a contract start date and duration are provided, the lack of direct document access and a clear e-submission portal reduces efficiency for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within this procurement.