Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Lincoln College loftisolering - Abbey Building, Friary Building og Temple Building

Åben
Frist
19 dage tilbage
April 24, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
023101-2026
Værdi
Ikke oplyst
Lokation
South Yorkshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 13, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 17, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 28, 2026

Budget
Ikke oplyst
Varighed
2 måneder
Lokation
South Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Salix PSDS Fase 4 - Lincoln College loftisolering - Abbey Building, Friary Building og Temple Building

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for loft insulation at Lincoln College is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and specified requirements. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and detailed evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, including a clear CPV code and NUTS code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the missing reveal date, which is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. The conditions for participation are generally documented, although specific evaluation criteria are absent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and timeline details. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The number of attached documents is stated, but their content is not accessible.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the procedure is clearly defined. The division into parts is a positive aspect for fairness. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though no specific company tailoring is evident.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practical accessibility for bidders. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent within itself.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Requirements categories outlined
Divided into parts

Bekymringer

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
No e-submission indicated
Lack of sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline