Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Radiologi Ventilationsudskiftningsarbejde på South Tyneside District Hospital

Åben
Frist
11 dage tilbage
April 16, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
024308-2026
Værdi
£120,000
Lokation
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 17, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 09, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 16, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

Budget
£120,000
Varighed
10 måneder
Lokation
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
74
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Udskiftning af ventilationsanlæg inklusive mekaniske serviceforberedende arbejder beliggende på South Tyneside District Hospital

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
74
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for radiology ventilation replacement works is generally well-structured with clear basic information and disclosed financial value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and access to tender document content, impacting its overall transparency and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic regulatory requirements, including a proper CPV code and no disclosed disputes. Deadlines are present, though their adequacy is subjective. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. The mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach to candidate selection. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable gap.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, only 4 tender documents are listed with no available content or summaries, significantly hindering a thorough review.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility are listed generically. The lack of specific evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of objective selection, but no overtly tailored requirements are evident.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies contract start and duration, and financing is implied by the estimated value. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of accessible tender document content reduce its practical usability for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and value are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logical within the context of a below-threshold procurement.

Bæredygtighed40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed
Open competition procedure

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No tender document content available
No e-submission requirement
Lack of sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Make the full content of tender documents accessible to potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline