Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Keystone Academy Trust - IT Managed Service

Åben
Frist
3 dage tilbage
April 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
016679-2026
Værdi
£1,800,000
Lokation
North East England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 24, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 31, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 07, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

December 22, 2026

Budget
£1,800,000
Varighed
60 måneder
Lokation
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

En fuld udliciteret managed service for 7 grundskoler Levering af relevant projektarbejde Uddannelsesmæssig supportservice til træning af brugere

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

AI udtrækker og organiserer alle krav fra udbudsdokumenter — obligatoriske kvalifikationer, tekniske specifikationer, finansielle betingelser og indsendelsesregler — tydeligt kategoriseret, så du ved præcis, hvad der kræves for at byde.

Log ind

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for an ICT Managed Service for primary schools is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall quality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is competitive. However, the absence of a reveal date for the tender documents is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date for tender documents
Klarhed80/100

The description of the service required is clear, outlining the need for a full outsourced managed service for 7 primary schools, including project work and user training. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the critical issue of missing tender document content significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully understand the scope and specific requirements without them.

No tender document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open and uses a competitive flexible procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are expected to be objective. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of a direct URL for documents reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No direct URL for documents
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Open and competitive procedure

Bekymringer

Missing tender document content
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide full content for all tender documents.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria and their weighting.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline