Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

UDVIKLING AF VÆRKTØJSSÆT TIL RETSDOKUMENTER

Åben
Frist
3 dage tilbage
April 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
027839-2026
Værdi
£2,000,000
Lokation
North East England, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 31, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 07, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£2,000,000
Varighed
36 måneder
Lokation
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Nationalarkivet søger en konsulentpartner til at yde ekspertise og vejledning om udnyttelsesmuligheder for deres 'Værktøjssæt til retsdokumenter'. Dette værktøjssæt indeholder kraftfulde værktøjer til udarbejdelse, datatransformation, berigelse og analyse af juridiske dokumenter, ideelle til AI-tilgange. Partneren vil hjælpe med at udvikle forslag, teste dem på markederne, identificere leveringspartnere og rådgive om forretningsmodeller. Ekspertise i at opbygge investeringsvenlige forretningsforslag, især i den offentlige sektor, og kendskab til den britiske juridiske sektor er meget ønskeligt. Kontrakten er på en indledende periode på 3 år med to forlængelsesmuligheder på op til 12 måneder hver, med et maksimalt forbrug på 2 mio. GBP (inklusive moms).

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

20 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (8)
Teknisk (8)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Must be able to work alongside in-house teams.
--Must provide expertise and guidance around exploitation opportunities in the legal tech sector.
--Must help develop propositions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Expertise in developing propositions for legal document toolkits.
--Experience in market testing and analysis for tech transfer/exploitation opportunities.
--Ability to identify and advise on business models for legal tech products.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Maximum expenditure over the contract period (including extensions) is £2m including VAT.
--Anticipated average maximum expenditure of £400,000 per year.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Legal Document Toolkit Development is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission, impacting overall practicality and completeness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The procedure is competitive. However, the submission deadline of 12 days from publication is very short, potentially impacting legal compliance regarding reasonable timeframes for open procedures.

Submission deadline may be too short for an open procedure.
Klarhed80/100

The description of the 'Legal Document Toolkit' and the project's objectives is detailed and provides a good understanding of the required expertise. The AI-extracted requirements are also clearly delineated.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, crucial details such as specific submission requirements and evaluation criteria are missing, which significantly impacts the completeness of the documentation.

No specific submission requirements detailed.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for selection, while not explicitly listed, are implied through the detailed eligibility and technical capability requirements, which seem objective. The mention of 'Knowledge and experience of the UK legal sector would also be highly desirable' is a specific preference but not a strict exclusion, maintaining a reasonable level of fairness.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies an estimated value and contract duration, and the contract start date is provided. However, the lack of information on e-submission methods and the absence of any document content or URLs for tender documents significantly hinder practical access and submission for potential bidders.

No e-submission method specified.
No document content available for review.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. The dates provided (publication, submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the tender documentation. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria mentioned.
No social criteria mentioned.

Styrker

Clear project description and objectives.
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements.
Estimated value and contract duration clearly specified.
Open procedure with disclosed value.

Bekymringer

Very short submission deadline.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Lack of specific submission instructions and e-submission details.
No tender documents available for download/review.

Anbefalinger

1. Extend the submission deadline to allow adequate time for bidders.
2. Publish detailed evaluation criteria and submission guidelines.
3. Provide direct links or access to all necessary tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline