Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

SBC0326 Levering af ukrudtsbekæmpelsesmiddel til Stevenage Borough Council og East Herts Council

Åben
Frist
3 dage tilbage
April 07, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
019479-2026
Værdi
£456,000
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 04, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 31, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 07, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 14, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£456,000
Varighed
24 måneder
Lokation
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Stevenage Borough Council leder et udbud af ukrudtsbekæmpelsesmiddel, bestående af to separate partier. Parti 1 for Stevenage Borough Council og Parti 2 for East Hertfordshire District Council. Tilbudsgivere kan ansøge om et eller begge partier. Kontraktperioden for hvert parti er en indledende periode på to (2) år med mulighed for forlængelse op til et (1) år. Dette udbud er en åben procedure. Organisationer, der ønsker at deltage i dette projekt, opfordres til at 'udtrykke interesse' og 'tilmelde sig', hvilket giver adgang til de fulde udbudsdokumenter i e-udbudssystemet.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

15 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (6)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (5)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Tender and Social Value submissions must be uploaded and submitted by the return deadline.
--Allow sufficient time for submission as late uploads will not be accepted.
--Documents should be uploaded as a PDF where possible.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Organizations wishing to take part must 'express an interest' and 'opt in' via the e-tendering system.
--Bidders may apply for either Lot 1, Lot 2, or both.
--Bidders must complete and submit a Tender by the deadline on the portal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of providing Weed Spray Application services.
--Specific technical requirements for Lot 1 and Lot 2 are detailed in their respective specifications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text, but financial standing is typically assessed in tenders.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for weed spray application is generally well-structured with clear descriptions and a defined process, though it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed sustainability considerations.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure with a clear submission deadline and contract duration. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. The procedure appears compliant with standard procurement regulations, though the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

Klarhed80/100

The description of services for both lots is clear, detailing the areas to be treated and the frequency of treatments. The distinction between Lot 1 and Lot 2 requirements is highlighted, encouraging bidders to read documentation carefully. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, which significantly impacts completeness.

No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing any interested organization to participate. The estimated value is disclosed, and the process of expressing interest and opting in via an e-tendering system promotes accessibility. The division into lots is a common and fair practice. The requirements do not appear tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender utilizes an e-tendering system for submission, which is practical. A URL for the e-tendering portal is provided. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the description of using an e-tendering system, creating confusion. Financing information is not detailed.

Contradiction regarding e-submission method
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, submission deadline, and contract duration are populated. The contract start date is logical relative to the submission deadline. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, and the dates are consistent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. While social value is mentioned as a separate submission requirement, it is not integrated into the core tender characteristics or evaluation.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation focus

Styrker

Clear description of services for two distinct lots
Open procedure promoting broad participation
Use of an e-tendering system for access and submission
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Bekymringer

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Inaccessibility of tender document content
Lack of detailed sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Make tender documents accessible or provide summaries for better bidder understanding.
3. Integrate sustainability and social value aspects more explicitly into the tender requirements and evaluation.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline