Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

EMMS Marketing

Åben
Frist
18 dage tilbage
April 22, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026902-2026
Værdi
£234,000
Lokation
East Midlands, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 24, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 15, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 22, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 25, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£234,000
Varighed
11 måneder
Lokation
East Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

East Midlands Made Smarter kræver en Marketing Support Provider, som vil være ansvarlig for at sikre, at der modtages tilstrækkeligt mange interessetilkendegivelser (EOI'er) via Made Smarter-webstedet eller via Made Smarter East Midlands-arrangementer for at nå målet for programmet for indledende engagementdiskussioner (IED) og for markedsføring af hele spektret af support til Made Smarter East Midlands-modtagere, både tidligere og nuværende. Modtagerne af Made Smarter Adoption East Midlands-programmet vil være SMV-producenter med en medarbejderstab på mellem 1 og 249, og de kan være placeret i Greater Lincolnshire, Leicestershire, Northamptonshire, Derbyshire og Nottinghamshire.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

12 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (5)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must be a Marketing Support Provider.
--Responsible for ensuring sufficient Expressions of Interest (EOIs) are received.
--Responsible for marketing the full range of support to Made Smarter East Midlands beneficiaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to drive Expressions of Interest (EOIs) through the Made Smarter website.
--Ability to drive Expressions of Interest (EOIs) through Made Smarter East Midlands Events.
--Ability to achieve the Initial Engagement Discussion (IED) programme target.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Marketing Support Provider is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the deadline might be tight.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the contract start date is logical. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the potential shortness of the submission deadline, which could impact compliance if not sufficient for thorough preparation.

Deadline may be too short
Klarhed80/100

The description of the required services and the target beneficiaries is clear and well-defined. The objectives, such as driving Expressions of Interest and marketing support, are explicitly stated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Missing submission requirements
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for beneficiaries are objective. The requirements are focused on the service needed rather than tailoring to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which could be perceived as less transparent.

Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The contract start date is clearly defined. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits the practicality for potential bidders. The availability of documents is noted, but their lack of content is a drawback.

No e-submission
No financing info
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are consistent and reasonable in sequence.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common elements in modern tenders to promote sustainability.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of objectives and target beneficiaries
Proper CPV code provided
Estimated value and contract duration/start date specified
Open procedure for broad participation

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential shortness of submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Provide full content within tender documents or clear links to access them.
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline if it is deemed too short for adequate preparation.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline