Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Totalrådgivning til renovering af Lærkeskolen i Egedal Kommune

Åben
Frist
13 dage tilbage
April 17, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Andet
Reference
00164624-2026
Værdi
kr37,000,000
Lokation
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 10, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 10, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 17, 2026

Budget
kr37,000,000
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Hovedstaden
Type
Andet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Disse udbudsbetingelser angår Egedal Kommunes udbud af Totalrådgiveraftale vedrørende renovering af eksisterende skole kaldet ”Lærkeskolen”, Præstegårdsvej 30, i Stenløse. Totalrådgiveren skal bistå Egedal Kommune i en gennemgribende renovering af Lærkeskolen, og Egedal kommune har behov for totalrådgivning i forbindelse med opgavens afklaring, afgrænsning, planlægning, programmering, forundersøgelser, herunder destruktive og miljøundersøgelser, projektering af opgaven, udbud samt rådgivning under ud

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

16 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (7)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Deadline for submission: 2026-04-17 10:00:00.
--The tender is an Open Procedure.
--Bidders must provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian, French, and Danish.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a Totalrådgiver (Total Advisor).
--Must be able to assist Egedal Kommune in a comprehensive renovation of Lærkeskolen.
--Must provide totalrådgivning (total advisory services) for clarification, delimitation, planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations), project design, tendering, and advisory services during execution and handover.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to manage a project divided into multiple sub-tasks executed sequentially due to the school's continued operation.
--Experience in planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations).
--Experience in project design and preparation of tender materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 37,000,000 EUR.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are mentioned in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and utilizes a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the process appears regulatory compliant. No disputes are indicated. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity and value of the project, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Submission deadline may be too short for the scope of work.
Klarhed80/100

The description of the required services is detailed, outlining the phases and specific tasks expected from the total advisor. The requirements for technical capability are also clearly extracted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The description provides a good overview of the project scope and phases. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and the specific content of the tender documents are not fully accessible or specified, impacting overall completeness.

Contract duration is not specified.
Full content of tender documents is not readily available.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective and based on the project's needs. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of readily accessible full tender document content, reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date is not specified.
Full tender document content is not readily available.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves renovation, which can have sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria. The mention of EU funding is absent.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear project scope and phased approach outlined.
Open procedure ensures broad participation.
E-procurement utilized.
Objective technical capability requirements.

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria.
Contract duration and start date not specified.
Full tender document content not readily accessible.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
2. Provide details on contract duration and start date.
3. Ensure full tender documents are easily accessible to all potential bidders.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline